Comparative evaluation of performance of different control strategies on UPQC connected distribution system

S. Srinath, M. P. Selvan, K. Vinothkumar
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of performance of different control strategies on UPQC connected distribution system","authors":"S. Srinath, M. P. Selvan, K. Vinothkumar","doi":"10.1109/ICIINFS.2010.5578651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative analysis of steady state behaviour of UPQC with three different control techniques, when connected to a distribution system to protect sensitive loads against power quality problems. The control strategies based only on hysteresis, SPWM and a combination of both for controlling the firing pulses of shunt and series APFs of UPQC are discussed. In common, PI control is used for maintaining DC link voltage. PSCAD/EMTDC is used to model the UPQC connected to a RL load. The simulated model is tested with all the three control strategies and the results are verified for voltage sag and swell compensation. A comparison is made between the control schemes, taking in account of the current through shunt APF and current at the point of common coupling (PCC). The results are appreciable when hysteresis type control is applied to shunt APF and SPWM control to series APF.","PeriodicalId":106953,"journal":{"name":"2010 5th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 5th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIINFS.2010.5578651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of steady state behaviour of UPQC with three different control techniques, when connected to a distribution system to protect sensitive loads against power quality problems. The control strategies based only on hysteresis, SPWM and a combination of both for controlling the firing pulses of shunt and series APFs of UPQC are discussed. In common, PI control is used for maintaining DC link voltage. PSCAD/EMTDC is used to model the UPQC connected to a RL load. The simulated model is tested with all the three control strategies and the results are verified for voltage sag and swell compensation. A comparison is made between the control schemes, taking in account of the current through shunt APF and current at the point of common coupling (PCC). The results are appreciable when hysteresis type control is applied to shunt APF and SPWM control to series APF.
UPQC连接配电系统不同控制策略的性能比较评价
本文介绍了UPQC与三种不同控制技术的稳态行为的比较分析,当连接到配电系统以保护敏感负载免受电能质量问题的影响时。对UPQC并联型和串联型有源滤波器发射脉冲的控制策略进行了讨论,包括仅基于磁滞、SPWM和两者结合的控制策略。通常,PI控制用于维持直流链路电压。PSCAD/EMTDC用于模拟连接到RL负载的UPQC。对仿真模型进行了测试,验证了三种控制策略对电压暂降和膨胀补偿的效果。在考虑并联APF电流和共耦合点电流的情况下,对两种控制方案进行了比较。将滞回型控制应用于并联有源滤波器,将SPWM控制应用于串联有源滤波器,效果显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书