BOXED IN. Challenges of Escaping the Inherited Spatial Realities of Apartheid from the Centre to The Periphery.

Tebogo Ramatlo
{"title":"BOXED IN. Challenges of Escaping the Inherited Spatial Realities of Apartheid from the Centre to The Periphery.","authors":"Tebogo Ramatlo","doi":"10.12795/astragalo.2021.i29.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper interrogates the existing spatial realities of Johannesburg as it was shaped by colonialism and the challenges of providing an inclusive urbanism between the centre, the periphery and the in-between. Johannesburg is a major urban centre in South Africa, with increasing economic and spatial inequality. The inherited spatial realities are still evident today; these structural realities are restrictive, unsustainable, and disadvantage communities ecologically, economically and socially. The paper is premised on an understanding that economic inequality is related to spatial inequality. The author draws on the personal lived experiences of being born on the periphery and the limitations of escaping the legacies of colonial spatial planning including the challenges of living on fragmented urban morphology.The author looks at the typology of the segregated post-apartheid township and the negative elements of apartheids spatial planning, especially focused on the restrictions it has on housing, employment opportunities, transport and public space on the periphery in comparison to the centre and how the in-between spaces further perpetuate socio-economic disparity. The author attempts through research to understand the resilience adopted by the Soweto community to have a safe and welcoming place despite the persistence of structural restrictions. The intention is to address the fragmentation and segregation caused by the inherited spatial structures. The planning of colonial cities, especially Johannesburg was based on achieving maximum control. The urban morphology was many times based on policies that organised people through race, class, and ethnicity.Its spatial planning was defined by separating citizens into different racial groups and economic classes. The rich white people located in the suburbs in the centre and the poor black people located in townships at the periphery separated by wide natural and man-made buffers in-between. The urban morphology of Johannesburg will be studied with a comparison analysis with other African cities which have similar patterns of spatial fragmentation in urban form due to colonial powers. The aim is to observe, compare and propose a defragmentation process towards the transformation of Johannesburg","PeriodicalId":166592,"journal":{"name":"Astrágalo. Cultura de la Arquitectura y la Ciudad","volume":"1 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrágalo. Cultura de la Arquitectura y la Ciudad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12795/astragalo.2021.i29.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper interrogates the existing spatial realities of Johannesburg as it was shaped by colonialism and the challenges of providing an inclusive urbanism between the centre, the periphery and the in-between. Johannesburg is a major urban centre in South Africa, with increasing economic and spatial inequality. The inherited spatial realities are still evident today; these structural realities are restrictive, unsustainable, and disadvantage communities ecologically, economically and socially. The paper is premised on an understanding that economic inequality is related to spatial inequality. The author draws on the personal lived experiences of being born on the periphery and the limitations of escaping the legacies of colonial spatial planning including the challenges of living on fragmented urban morphology.The author looks at the typology of the segregated post-apartheid township and the negative elements of apartheids spatial planning, especially focused on the restrictions it has on housing, employment opportunities, transport and public space on the periphery in comparison to the centre and how the in-between spaces further perpetuate socio-economic disparity. The author attempts through research to understand the resilience adopted by the Soweto community to have a safe and welcoming place despite the persistence of structural restrictions. The intention is to address the fragmentation and segregation caused by the inherited spatial structures. The planning of colonial cities, especially Johannesburg was based on achieving maximum control. The urban morphology was many times based on policies that organised people through race, class, and ethnicity.Its spatial planning was defined by separating citizens into different racial groups and economic classes. The rich white people located in the suburbs in the centre and the poor black people located in townships at the periphery separated by wide natural and man-made buffers in-between. The urban morphology of Johannesburg will be studied with a comparison analysis with other African cities which have similar patterns of spatial fragmentation in urban form due to colonial powers. The aim is to observe, compare and propose a defragmentation process towards the transformation of Johannesburg
盒装。从中心到外围逃避种族隔离继承的空间现实的挑战。
本文探讨了约翰内斯堡现有的空间现实,因为它是由殖民主义塑造的,以及在中心、边缘和中间之间提供包容性城市主义的挑战。约翰内斯堡是南非的主要城市中心,经济和空间不平等日益加剧。继承下来的空间现实今天仍然很明显;这些结构性现实是限制性的、不可持续的,并且在生态、经济和社会方面对社区不利。本文的前提是理解经济不平等与空间不平等有关。作者借鉴了出生在边缘地区的个人生活经历,以及逃避殖民空间规划遗产的局限性,包括生活在碎片化城市形态中的挑战。作者着眼于后种族隔离城镇的类型学和种族隔离空间规划的负面因素,特别关注与中心相比,它对周边住房、就业机会、交通和公共空间的限制,以及中间空间如何进一步延续社会经济差距。作者试图通过研究来理解索韦托社区所采取的弹性,尽管存在结构性限制,但仍有一个安全和欢迎的地方。其目的是解决由继承的空间结构造成的碎片化和隔离。殖民地城市的规划,尤其是约翰内斯堡的规划,是建立在实现最大控制的基础上的。城市形态很多时候是建立在按种族、阶级和民族组织人民的政策基础上的。它的空间规划是通过将公民划分为不同的种族群体和经济阶层来定义的。富裕的白人住在中心的郊区,贫穷的黑人住在外围的城镇,中间被宽阔的自然和人为的缓冲区隔开。将研究约翰内斯堡的城市形态,并与其他非洲城市进行比较分析,这些城市由于殖民列强而在城市形态上具有类似的空间碎片化模式。其目的是观察、比较和提出一个促进约翰内斯堡转型的碎片化进程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信