The Case for Workplace Democracy

D. Ellerman
{"title":"The Case for Workplace Democracy","authors":"D. Ellerman","doi":"10.4324/9781351205634-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter I seek to provide a theoretical defence of workplace democracy that is independent from and outside the lineage of Marxist and communist theory. Common to the council movements, anarchosyndicalism and many other forms of libertarian socialism was the idea “that workers’ selfmanagement was central.”1 Yet the idea of workers’ control has not been subject to the same theoretical development as Marx’s theory, not to mention capitalist economic theory. This chapter aims to contribute at a theoretical level by providing a justification and defence of selfmanaged workplaces that is independent of the particular historical tradition of the council movements. There is a clear and definitive case for workplace democracy based on first principles that descends to modern times through the Reformation and Enlightenment in the abolitionist, democratic and feminist movements. By the twentieth century, the arguments had been scattered and lost – like the bones of some ancient beast scattered in a desert – partly due to misconceptions, mental blocks and misinterpretations embodied in Marxism, liberalism and economic theory. When one has worked through some of these intellectual roadblocks, then one may be better able to reassemble the case for workplace democracy from wellknown first principles developed in the abolitionist, democratic and feminist movements.","PeriodicalId":350049,"journal":{"name":"Council Democracy","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Council Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351205634-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this chapter I seek to provide a theoretical defence of workplace democracy that is independent from and outside the lineage of Marxist and communist theory. Common to the council movements, anarchosyndicalism and many other forms of libertarian socialism was the idea “that workers’ selfmanagement was central.”1 Yet the idea of workers’ control has not been subject to the same theoretical development as Marx’s theory, not to mention capitalist economic theory. This chapter aims to contribute at a theoretical level by providing a justification and defence of selfmanaged workplaces that is independent of the particular historical tradition of the council movements. There is a clear and definitive case for workplace democracy based on first principles that descends to modern times through the Reformation and Enlightenment in the abolitionist, democratic and feminist movements. By the twentieth century, the arguments had been scattered and lost – like the bones of some ancient beast scattered in a desert – partly due to misconceptions, mental blocks and misinterpretations embodied in Marxism, liberalism and economic theory. When one has worked through some of these intellectual roadblocks, then one may be better able to reassemble the case for workplace democracy from wellknown first principles developed in the abolitionist, democratic and feminist movements.
工作场所民主的案例
在本章中,我试图为独立于马克思主义和共产主义理论谱系之外的工作场所民主提供理论辩护。委员会运动、无政府工团主义和许多其他形式的自由意志社会主义都有一个共同点,那就是“工人的自我管理是核心”。然而,工人控制的思想并没有像马克思的理论那样受到同样的理论发展,更不用说资本主义经济理论了。本章旨在通过提供独立于委员会运动特定历史传统的自我管理工作场所的理由和辩护,在理论层面上做出贡献。在废奴主义、民主主义和女权主义运动中,通过宗教改革和启蒙运动,一直延续到现代,以第一原则为基础的工作场所民主有一个明确而明确的例子。到了20世纪,这些争论已经散失,就像散落在沙漠里的古代野兽的骨头一样,部分原因是马克思主义、自由主义和经济理论中体现的误解、思维障碍和误解。当一个人克服了这些智力障碍,那么他就能更好地从废奴主义、民主主义和女权主义运动中发展出来的著名的第一原则中重新组装工作场所民主的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信