Statutory and private health insurance in Germany and Chile: two stories of coexistence and conflict

Stefanie Ettelt, A. Roman-Urrestarazu
{"title":"Statutory and private health insurance in Germany and Chile: two stories of coexistence and conflict","authors":"Stefanie Ettelt, A. Roman-Urrestarazu","doi":"10.1017/9781139026468.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Germany and Chile, the market for private health insurance exists alongside and “within” a statutory health insurance system that covers a large majority of the population. Private cover comes in two forms: substitutive, chosen to replace statutory cover, which means that the privately insured do not contribute to this aspect of the social security system (unless statutory health insurance is partly funded through the government budget); and complementary or supplementary, allowing people to “top up” publicly financed benefits. In both countries, the vast majority of the population is covered by statutory health insurance. However, some parts of the population, mostly those who are able to afford it, have the option of choosing between private and statutory coverage. In Germany, the group of people given this choice is limited by regulation, with those allowed to “opt out” of the statutory system having to demonstrate that they have earnings above a threshold. Once they have chosen the private option, the possibility of returning to statutory cover is limited. In Chile, choice of substitutive private cover is also dependent on earnings as a private plan is significantly more expensive than contributions to the statutory system, but there is no fixed threshold for those who wish to opt out. Also, the privately insured in Chile are allowed to re-enter the statutory system at any time, an option that has been intentionally precluded in the German system to reduce the potential for further risk segmentation. This chapter describes the origins and development of private health insurance in Germany and Chile, providing a comparative assessment of its effects on consumers and the health financing system as a whole. The chapter provides a detailed overview of the market for private health insurance in both countries, followed by a comparative assessment of the impact of private cover in relation to financial protection, equity","PeriodicalId":187387,"journal":{"name":"Private Health Insurance","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Private Health Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139026468.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Germany and Chile, the market for private health insurance exists alongside and “within” a statutory health insurance system that covers a large majority of the population. Private cover comes in two forms: substitutive, chosen to replace statutory cover, which means that the privately insured do not contribute to this aspect of the social security system (unless statutory health insurance is partly funded through the government budget); and complementary or supplementary, allowing people to “top up” publicly financed benefits. In both countries, the vast majority of the population is covered by statutory health insurance. However, some parts of the population, mostly those who are able to afford it, have the option of choosing between private and statutory coverage. In Germany, the group of people given this choice is limited by regulation, with those allowed to “opt out” of the statutory system having to demonstrate that they have earnings above a threshold. Once they have chosen the private option, the possibility of returning to statutory cover is limited. In Chile, choice of substitutive private cover is also dependent on earnings as a private plan is significantly more expensive than contributions to the statutory system, but there is no fixed threshold for those who wish to opt out. Also, the privately insured in Chile are allowed to re-enter the statutory system at any time, an option that has been intentionally precluded in the German system to reduce the potential for further risk segmentation. This chapter describes the origins and development of private health insurance in Germany and Chile, providing a comparative assessment of its effects on consumers and the health financing system as a whole. The chapter provides a detailed overview of the market for private health insurance in both countries, followed by a comparative assessment of the impact of private cover in relation to financial protection, equity
德国和智利的法定和私人健康保险:两个共存和冲突的故事
在德国和智利,私人健康保险市场与覆盖绝大多数人口的法定健康保险制度并存并“在其中”存在。私人保险有两种形式:替代保险,选择取代法定保险,这意味着私人投保人不为社会保障制度的这一方面作出贡献(除非法定健康保险的部分资金来自政府预算);补充或补充,允许人们“补充”公共资助的福利。在这两个国家,绝大多数人口都享有法定健康保险。然而,一部分人,主要是那些能够负担得起的人,可以在私人保险和法定保险之间做出选择。在德国,被给予这种选择的人群受到监管的限制,那些被允许“选择退出”法定制度的人必须证明他们的收入超过了一个门槛。一旦他们选择了私人保险,恢复法定保险的可能性是有限的。在智利,选择替代的私人保险也取决于收入,因为私人计划比向法定制度缴款要昂贵得多,但对那些希望选择退出的人没有固定的门槛。此外,智利的私人保险被允许随时重新进入法定体系,这一选择在德国体系中被有意排除,以减少进一步风险分割的可能性。本章描述了德国和智利私人医疗保险的起源和发展,并对其对消费者和整个医疗融资系统的影响进行了比较评估。本章详细概述了两国的私人医疗保险市场,然后比较评估了私人保险在财务保护和公平方面的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信