Using Design Patterns for Math Preservice Teacher Education

P. Inventado, Sharris Gayle Francisco Inventado, Noboru Matsuda, Yeping Li, P. Scupelli, Korinn S. Ostrow, N. Heffernan, S. Tu, C. Mason, Mary Logue, Patrick McGuire
{"title":"Using Design Patterns for Math Preservice Teacher Education","authors":"P. Inventado, Sharris Gayle Francisco Inventado, Noboru Matsuda, Yeping Li, P. Scupelli, Korinn S. Ostrow, N. Heffernan, S. Tu, C. Mason, Mary Logue, Patrick McGuire","doi":"10.1145/3282308.3282340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experienced teachers effectively address student misconceptions and learning difficulties by employing high-quality pedagogical strategies that they have developed through experience. It is difficult to discover effective strategies because it takes a lot of trial and error before a teacher can conclude that a particular approach improves student learning. Researchers have used educational design patterns to encapsulate high-quality strategies that facilitate the transfer of pedagogical knowledge. In this work, we investigated the feasibility of utilizing three educational design patterns as a teaching tool for math preservice teacher education: Feedback Sandwich, Pitfall Diagnosis and Prevention, and Worked Examples. Specifically, we used design patterns to investigate how preservice teachers provided feedback to students who gave common wrong answers to a given math problem and compared their feedback before and after they were introduced to educational design patterns. Results indicated that design patterns helped preservice teachers consider other aspects of feedback such as students' self-regard, common misconceptions, and prior knowledge into their feedback for common wrong answers on math problems. The limited set of three design patterns introduced in the study focused on feedback presentation. Results also indicated preservice teachers may benefit from design patterns that address other aspects of feedback such as content granularity, feedback length, and presentation medium. Implications of this study, including the potential of using educational design patterns to improve preservice teacher education, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":136534,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3282308.3282340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Experienced teachers effectively address student misconceptions and learning difficulties by employing high-quality pedagogical strategies that they have developed through experience. It is difficult to discover effective strategies because it takes a lot of trial and error before a teacher can conclude that a particular approach improves student learning. Researchers have used educational design patterns to encapsulate high-quality strategies that facilitate the transfer of pedagogical knowledge. In this work, we investigated the feasibility of utilizing three educational design patterns as a teaching tool for math preservice teacher education: Feedback Sandwich, Pitfall Diagnosis and Prevention, and Worked Examples. Specifically, we used design patterns to investigate how preservice teachers provided feedback to students who gave common wrong answers to a given math problem and compared their feedback before and after they were introduced to educational design patterns. Results indicated that design patterns helped preservice teachers consider other aspects of feedback such as students' self-regard, common misconceptions, and prior knowledge into their feedback for common wrong answers on math problems. The limited set of three design patterns introduced in the study focused on feedback presentation. Results also indicated preservice teachers may benefit from design patterns that address other aspects of feedback such as content granularity, feedback length, and presentation medium. Implications of this study, including the potential of using educational design patterns to improve preservice teacher education, are discussed.
运用设计模式进行数学职前教师教育
经验丰富的教师通过采用他们通过经验开发的高质量教学策略,有效地解决学生的误解和学习困难。发现有效的策略是很困难的,因为在老师得出某种方法能提高学生学习的结论之前,需要进行大量的试验和错误。研究人员使用教育设计模式来封装促进教学知识转移的高质量策略。本文探讨了三种教育设计模式作为数学职前教师教育的教学工具的可行性:反馈三明治、陷阱诊断与预防和工作实例。具体地说,我们使用设计模式来调查职前教师如何向在给定数学问题上给出常见错误答案的学生提供反馈,并比较他们在引入教育设计模式之前和之后的反馈。结果表明,设计模式有助于职前教师在对数学问题常见错误答案的反馈中考虑学生的自尊、常见误解和先验知识等方面的反馈。研究中介绍的有限的三种设计模式集中在反馈表示上。结果还表明,职前教师可能会受益于解决反馈的其他方面的设计模式,如内容粒度、反馈长度和呈现媒介。本文讨论了本研究的意义,包括利用教育设计模式改善职前教师教育的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信