Building Digital Walls and Making Speech and Internet Freedom (or Chinese Technology) Pay for It

Apratim Vidyarthi, Rachel Hulvey
{"title":"Building Digital Walls and Making Speech and Internet Freedom (or Chinese Technology) Pay for It","authors":"Apratim Vidyarthi, Rachel Hulvey","doi":"10.55496/leme6374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More broadly, the tools at the US government’s disposal— IEEPA, Congressional lawmaking authority, and CFIUS review—encourage the use of such flimsy rationale and a lack of transparency, which ultimately promotes such broad bans; and the costs of these bans are dear. There may be First Amendment implications, and at the very least, a chilling of speech. There are also significant impacts on American foreign policy, from legitimizing the Chinese strategy of cybersovereignty and government regulation, to the creation of incentives to localize data in a manner that might undermine American law enforcement efforts.","PeriodicalId":106680,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55496/leme6374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

More broadly, the tools at the US government’s disposal— IEEPA, Congressional lawmaking authority, and CFIUS review—encourage the use of such flimsy rationale and a lack of transparency, which ultimately promotes such broad bans; and the costs of these bans are dear. There may be First Amendment implications, and at the very least, a chilling of speech. There are also significant impacts on American foreign policy, from legitimizing the Chinese strategy of cybersovereignty and government regulation, to the creation of incentives to localize data in a manner that might undermine American law enforcement efforts.
建立数字墙,让言论和互联网自由(或中国技术)为此付出代价
更广泛地说,美国政府可以使用的工具——IEEPA、国会立法机构和CFIUS的审查——鼓励使用这种站不住脚的理由和缺乏透明度,最终推动了这种广泛的禁令;这些禁令的代价是高昂的。这可能会涉及到第一修正案,至少会让言论不寒而栗。这也对美国的外交政策产生了重大影响,从使中国的网络主权和政府监管战略合法化,到建立激励机制,以可能破坏美国执法努力的方式将数据本地化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信