The Walls Are Closing in: Postural Responses to a Virtual Reality Claustrophobic Simulation

H. Chander, Hannah Freeman, C. Hill, Christopher Hudson, Sachini N. K. Kodithuwakku Arachchige, Alana Turner, J. A. Jones, A. Knight
{"title":"The Walls Are Closing in: Postural Responses to a Virtual Reality Claustrophobic Simulation","authors":"H. Chander, Hannah Freeman, C. Hill, Christopher Hudson, Sachini N. K. Kodithuwakku Arachchige, Alana Turner, J. A. Jones, A. Knight","doi":"10.3390/ctn6020015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Changes in the visual environment and thereby, the spatial orientation, can induce postural instability leading to falls. Virtual reality (VR) has been used to expose individuals to virtual environments (VE) that increase postural threats. Claustrophobia is an anxiety disorder categorized under situational phobias and can induce such postural threats in a VE. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate if VR-generated claustrophobic simulation has any impact on postural threats that might lead to postural instability. Methods: Thirty healthy men and women (age: 20.7 ± 1.2 years; height: 166.5 ± 7.3 cm; mass: 71.7 ± 16.2 kg) were tested for postural stability while standing on a force platform, upon exposure to five different testing trials, including a normal stance (NoVR), in stationary VE (VR), and three consecutive, randomly initiated, unexpected claustrophobia trials (VR CP1, VR CP2, VR CP3). The claustrophobia trials involved all four walls closing in towards the center of the room. Center of pressure (COP)-derived postural sway variables were analyzed with a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance at an alpha level of 0.05. Results: Significant main effect differences existed in all but one dependent COP-derived postural sway variables, at p < 0.05. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with a Bonferroni correction revealed that, predominantly, postural sway excursions were significantly lower in claustrophobia trials compared to NoVR and VR, but only accomplished with significantly increased sway velocity. Conclusion: The VR CP trials induced lower postural sway magnitude, but with increased velocity, suggesting a bracing and co-contraction strategy when exposed to virtual claustrophobic postural threats. Additionally, postural sway decreased with subsequent claustrophobia trials, suggesting potential motor learning effects. Findings from the study offer insights to postural control behavior under virtual claustrophobic simulations and can aid in VR exposure therapy for claustrophobia.","PeriodicalId":242430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn6020015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Changes in the visual environment and thereby, the spatial orientation, can induce postural instability leading to falls. Virtual reality (VR) has been used to expose individuals to virtual environments (VE) that increase postural threats. Claustrophobia is an anxiety disorder categorized under situational phobias and can induce such postural threats in a VE. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate if VR-generated claustrophobic simulation has any impact on postural threats that might lead to postural instability. Methods: Thirty healthy men and women (age: 20.7 ± 1.2 years; height: 166.5 ± 7.3 cm; mass: 71.7 ± 16.2 kg) were tested for postural stability while standing on a force platform, upon exposure to five different testing trials, including a normal stance (NoVR), in stationary VE (VR), and three consecutive, randomly initiated, unexpected claustrophobia trials (VR CP1, VR CP2, VR CP3). The claustrophobia trials involved all four walls closing in towards the center of the room. Center of pressure (COP)-derived postural sway variables were analyzed with a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance at an alpha level of 0.05. Results: Significant main effect differences existed in all but one dependent COP-derived postural sway variables, at p < 0.05. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with a Bonferroni correction revealed that, predominantly, postural sway excursions were significantly lower in claustrophobia trials compared to NoVR and VR, but only accomplished with significantly increased sway velocity. Conclusion: The VR CP trials induced lower postural sway magnitude, but with increased velocity, suggesting a bracing and co-contraction strategy when exposed to virtual claustrophobic postural threats. Additionally, postural sway decreased with subsequent claustrophobia trials, suggesting potential motor learning effects. Findings from the study offer insights to postural control behavior under virtual claustrophobic simulations and can aid in VR exposure therapy for claustrophobia.
墙壁正在逼近:对虚拟现实幽闭恐惧症模拟的姿势反应
背景:视觉环境的变化,以及空间方向的变化,会导致姿势不稳定,从而导致跌倒。虚拟现实(VR)已被用于将个体暴露于增加姿势威胁的虚拟环境(VE)中。幽闭恐惧症是一种被归类为情境恐惧症的焦虑障碍,可以在VE中诱发这种姿势威胁。目的:本研究的目的是调查vr产生的幽闭恐惧症模拟是否对可能导致姿势不稳定的姿势威胁有任何影响。方法:健康男女30例(年龄:20.7±1.2岁;高度:166.5±7.3 cm;体重:71.7±16.2 kg)的受试者,在接受五种不同的测试试验(包括正常站立(NoVR)、静止VE (VR)和连续三种随机启动的意外幽闭恐惧症试验(VR CP1、VR CP2、VR CP3)后,在力台上站立时的姿势稳定性测试。在幽闭恐惧症试验中,四面墙都向房间中心靠拢。对压力中心(COP)衍生的体位摇摆变量进行单向重复测量方差分析,α水平为0.05。结果:除了一个相关的copd衍生的姿势摇摆变量外,其他所有的主效应都存在显著差异,p < 0.05。经过Bonferroni校正后的两两比较显示,与NoVR和VR相比,幽闭恐惧症试验中的姿势摇摆偏移明显更低,但只有在摇摆速度显著增加的情况下才能实现。结论:虚拟幽闭恐惧症实验诱导的体位摇摆幅度较低,但速度增加,提示当暴露于虚拟幽闭恐惧症体位威胁时,存在支撑和共同收缩策略。此外,在随后的幽闭恐惧症试验中,姿势摇摆减少,表明潜在的运动学习影响。该研究结果为虚拟幽闭恐惧症模拟下的姿势控制行为提供了见解,并有助于幽闭恐惧症的VR暴露治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信