5. On the Discourse of the “New Sexual Morality” in the German Empire: Robert Michels’ Sexual Ethics between Women’s Movement, Social Democracy, and Sociology

Vincent Streichhahn
{"title":"5. On the Discourse of the “New Sexual Morality” in the German Empire: Robert Michels’ Sexual Ethics between Women’s Movement, Social Democracy, and Sociology","authors":"Vincent Streichhahn","doi":"10.1515/9783110751451-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on Robert Michels (1876– 1936) tends to think of the sociologist from the end. In the reception of the public, Michels appears predominantly as an elite theorist, whose classic Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy1 of 1911 reflects his disappointment with representative democracy on the one hand, and in which, on the other hand, the “nucleus of an authoritarian understanding of politics” is laid out, which predestined him as Benito Mussolini’s (1883– 1945) later Fascism apologete. This study, read as a disappointment in Michels’ former democratic hopes, would have led him ultimately from social democracy via syndicalism to Italian Fascism.2 Other works and thus different strands of interpretation are largely unknown compared to Political Parties. In the same year as Michels’ classic, however, another work was published, which is the focus of this article and has the potential to shake up the previous reception, namely Sexual Ethics: A Study of Borderland Questions.3 This “sexual-","PeriodicalId":126475,"journal":{"name":"Marriage Discourses","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marriage Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110751451-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on Robert Michels (1876– 1936) tends to think of the sociologist from the end. In the reception of the public, Michels appears predominantly as an elite theorist, whose classic Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy1 of 1911 reflects his disappointment with representative democracy on the one hand, and in which, on the other hand, the “nucleus of an authoritarian understanding of politics” is laid out, which predestined him as Benito Mussolini’s (1883– 1945) later Fascism apologete. This study, read as a disappointment in Michels’ former democratic hopes, would have led him ultimately from social democracy via syndicalism to Italian Fascism.2 Other works and thus different strands of interpretation are largely unknown compared to Political Parties. In the same year as Michels’ classic, however, another work was published, which is the focus of this article and has the potential to shake up the previous reception, namely Sexual Ethics: A Study of Borderland Questions.3 This “sexual-
5. 论德意志帝国的“新性道德”话语——罗伯特·米歇尔斯在妇女运动、社会民主主义与社会学之间的性伦理
对罗伯特·米歇尔斯(1876 - 1936)的研究倾向于从最后考虑社会学家。在公众的接受中,米歇尔斯主要以精英理论家的身份出现,他的经典著作《政党:1911年现代民主的寡头政治倾向的社会学研究》一方面反映了他对代议制民主的失望,另一方面,在这本书中,“对政治的威权主义理解的核心”被提出,这注定了他成为贝尼托·墨索里尼(1883 - 1945)后来法西斯主义的辩手。这项研究,被解读为对米歇尔斯以前的民主希望的失望,最终导致他从社会民主主义到工团主义再到意大利法西斯主义。2与《政党》相比,其他作品和不同的解释在很大程度上是未知的。然而,与米歇尔的经典同一年,另一部作品出版了,这是本文的重点,有可能动摇之前的接受,即性伦理:对边境问题的研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信