Perioperative outcomes of the introduction of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy

Saki Sawayama, Ryusuke Murakami, Y. Taga, Y. Kawaguchi, A. Yanai, H. Nonogaki
{"title":"Perioperative outcomes of the introduction of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy","authors":"Saki Sawayama, Ryusuke Murakami, Y. Taga, Y. Kawaguchi, A. Yanai, H. Nonogaki","doi":"10.5180/JSGOE.36.2_106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Perioperative outcomes in the first year of introducing robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) using the daVinci Xi surgical system were evaluated based on comparisons with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH) for simple hysterectomies performed during the same period. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving comparisons between 38 cases of RAH from June 2019 to April 2020 and 28 cases of CLH from August 2018 to April 2020. All cases involved simple hysterectomies performed by 4 doctors (1 endoscopic technique-certified medical doctor and 3 doctors with less than 10 years of experience). Results: The characteristics of patients who underwent RAH and CLH were as follows, respectively: age, 47 vs 49 years (mean, p=0.62); body mass index, 23.4vs 22.9 kg/m (mean, p=0.57); uterine weight, 152 and 175 g (median, p=0.39); manipulator use, 28 (73%) and 21 (75%) cases (frequency, p=0.90); and 0/4 cases with endometriotic adhesions with Douglas fossa closure, 0 and 4 cases (frequency, p=0.028). The total operation time (from skin incision to skin closure) was significantly shorter in RAH cases (mean difference, 29 minutes; p=0.048) than in CLH cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss and perioperative complications. Conclusion: We safely introduced RAH by selecting appropriate cases in advance. In the future, it is necessary to study robot-assisted surgery so that it can be safely introduced in patients with large uterine weights and endometriotic","PeriodicalId":325241,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5180/JSGOE.36.2_106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Perioperative outcomes in the first year of introducing robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) using the daVinci Xi surgical system were evaluated based on comparisons with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH) for simple hysterectomies performed during the same period. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving comparisons between 38 cases of RAH from June 2019 to April 2020 and 28 cases of CLH from August 2018 to April 2020. All cases involved simple hysterectomies performed by 4 doctors (1 endoscopic technique-certified medical doctor and 3 doctors with less than 10 years of experience). Results: The characteristics of patients who underwent RAH and CLH were as follows, respectively: age, 47 vs 49 years (mean, p=0.62); body mass index, 23.4vs 22.9 kg/m (mean, p=0.57); uterine weight, 152 and 175 g (median, p=0.39); manipulator use, 28 (73%) and 21 (75%) cases (frequency, p=0.90); and 0/4 cases with endometriotic adhesions with Douglas fossa closure, 0 and 4 cases (frequency, p=0.028). The total operation time (from skin incision to skin closure) was significantly shorter in RAH cases (mean difference, 29 minutes; p=0.048) than in CLH cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss and perioperative complications. Conclusion: We safely introduced RAH by selecting appropriate cases in advance. In the future, it is necessary to study robot-assisted surgery so that it can be safely introduced in patients with large uterine weights and endometriotic
引入机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术的围手术期效果
目的:通过与同期行单纯子宫切除术的传统腹腔镜子宫切除术(CLH)进行比较,评估采用达芬奇手术系统的机器人辅助子宫切除术(RAH)第一年的围手术期疗效。方法:回顾性分析2019年6月至2020年4月38例RAH和2018年8月至2020年4月28例CLH。所有病例均由4名医生(1名内窥镜技术认证的医生和3名经验不足10年的医生)实施简单子宫切除术。结果:RAH和CLH患者的特征分别为:年龄47 vs 49岁(平均p=0.62);体重指数23.4vs 22.9 kg/m(平均,p=0.57);子宫重量,152和175 g(中位数,p=0.39);使用机械手28例(73%)、21例(75%)(频率,p=0.90);伴有道格拉斯窝闭合的子宫内膜异位症粘连0/4例,0/4例(频率,p=0.028)。RAH病例的总手术时间(从皮肤切开到皮肤闭合)显著缩短(平均差29分钟;p=0.048)。两组在出血量和围手术期并发症方面无显著差异。结论:通过提前选择合适的病例,可以安全地引入RAH。未来,有必要研究机器人辅助手术,以便将其安全地引入子宫重量大和子宫内膜异位症患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信