{"title":"History Teaching and Peace Education in Southeast Europe","authors":"Christina Koulouri","doi":"10.15057/18053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"*After the fall of communist regimes, perceptions of the past and the writing of history have been revised. The rewriting of the Balkan countriesʼ history corresponded to major changes in historiography but also reflected changes in collective self-definitions. On the other hand, the wars in Yugoslavia triggered interest and intervention by Western organisations into history teaching. The Council of Europe, teachersʼ associations, the EU and Western governments, the Stability Pact, NGOs elaborated projects aimed at revising history teaching. All this activity was founded on the belief that history can be used as a tool of reconciliation in a region divided by nationalist conflicts. Therefore, history teaching has been conceived as part of a major project of peace education in Southeast Europe. In my paper, I am going to analyse the different levels of rewriting the history of Southeast Europe ʻinsideʼ and ʻoutsideʼ the region, the international tradition of projects of peace education in the 20th century (after the two world wars), the political cultures of intervention in the West, which sustained the process of revision of history teaching in Southeast Europe, and the reactions in Balkan societies themselves.","PeriodicalId":265291,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of arts and sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of arts and sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/18053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
*After the fall of communist regimes, perceptions of the past and the writing of history have been revised. The rewriting of the Balkan countriesʼ history corresponded to major changes in historiography but also reflected changes in collective self-definitions. On the other hand, the wars in Yugoslavia triggered interest and intervention by Western organisations into history teaching. The Council of Europe, teachersʼ associations, the EU and Western governments, the Stability Pact, NGOs elaborated projects aimed at revising history teaching. All this activity was founded on the belief that history can be used as a tool of reconciliation in a region divided by nationalist conflicts. Therefore, history teaching has been conceived as part of a major project of peace education in Southeast Europe. In my paper, I am going to analyse the different levels of rewriting the history of Southeast Europe ʻinsideʼ and ʻoutsideʼ the region, the international tradition of projects of peace education in the 20th century (after the two world wars), the political cultures of intervention in the West, which sustained the process of revision of history teaching in Southeast Europe, and the reactions in Balkan societies themselves.
*共产主义政权倒台后,对过去的看法和对历史的书写都被修改了。巴尔干国家历史的改写与史学的重大变化相对应,但也反映了集体自我定义的变化。另一方面,南斯拉夫战争引发了西方组织对历史教学的兴趣和干预。欧洲委员会(Council of Europe)、教师协会、欧盟和西方政府、《稳定公约》(Stability Pact)、非政府组织制定了旨在修订历史教学的项目。所有这些活动都是基于这样一种信念,即历史可以被用作一个因民族主义冲突而分裂的地区的和解工具。因此,历史教学已被视为东南欧和平教育重大项目的一部分。在我的论文中,我将分析改写东南欧历史的不同层次,在该地区“内部”和“外部”,20世纪(两次世界大战之后)和平教育项目的国际传统,西方干预的政治文化,它维持了东南欧历史教学的修订过程,以及巴尔干社会本身的反应。