System Science Traditions: Differing Philosophical Assumptions

Eric B. Dent
{"title":"System Science Traditions: Differing Philosophical Assumptions","authors":"Eric B. Dent","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2326323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is in vogue to \"take a systems approach,\" yet what exactly a systems approach is varies considerably depending upon the systems science tradition examined. Systems science traditions tend to share a set of underlying assumptions which are less common in other scientific fields. Still, philosophical assumptions are not common across systems science traditions. We examine six traditions within systems science -- cybernetics, general systems theory, organizational learning, operations research, total quality management, and system dynamics. We then consider seven underlying assumptions -- self-organization, observation, causality, reflexivity, predictability, environment, and relationships. Finally, we assess where each tradition stands with respect to each of the underlying assumptions.","PeriodicalId":325239,"journal":{"name":"Systems: Journal of Transdisciplinary Systems Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems: Journal of Transdisciplinary Systems Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2326323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is in vogue to "take a systems approach," yet what exactly a systems approach is varies considerably depending upon the systems science tradition examined. Systems science traditions tend to share a set of underlying assumptions which are less common in other scientific fields. Still, philosophical assumptions are not common across systems science traditions. We examine six traditions within systems science -- cybernetics, general systems theory, organizational learning, operations research, total quality management, and system dynamics. We then consider seven underlying assumptions -- self-organization, observation, causality, reflexivity, predictability, environment, and relationships. Finally, we assess where each tradition stands with respect to each of the underlying assumptions.
系统科学传统:不同的哲学假设
“采用系统方法”很流行,但是系统方法究竟是什么,取决于所研究的系统科学传统。系统科学传统倾向于共享一组在其他科学领域不太常见的潜在假设。尽管如此,哲学假设在系统科学传统中并不常见。我们研究了系统科学中的六个传统——控制论、一般系统理论、组织学习、运筹学、全面质量管理和系统动力学。然后我们考虑七个潜在的假设——自组织、观察、因果关系、反身性、可预测性、环境和关系。最后,我们根据每个潜在的假设来评估每个传统所处的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信