{"title":"QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENTS OF ABLATION-PRODUCTS TRANSPORT IN A SUPERSONIC TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER USING SIMULTANEOUS PIV AND NAPHTHALENE PLIF","authors":"C. Combs, N. Clemens","doi":"10.1615/tsfp9.950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dispersion of a passive scalar in a Mach 5 turbulent boundary layer is investigated using a lowtemperature sublimating ablator (naphthalene). Twodimensional fields of naphthalene mole fraction and velocity are obtained by using simultaneous particle image velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF). The images show large-scale naphthalene vapor structures that coincide with regions of relatively low streamwise velocity. Additionally, the covariance of naphthalene mole fraction with velocity indicates that an ejection mechanism is transporting low-momentum, highscalar-concentration fluid away from the wall, resulting in the protrusions of naphthalene vapor evident in the instantaneous PLIF images. Mean profiles of streamwise velocity and naphthalene mole fraction are also presented, with the mean mole fraction profile having the expected shape of a classical scalar boundary layer profile. INTRODUCTION There remains continued interest in the study of ablation owing to the need to develop suitable thermal protection systems (TPS) for spacecraft that undergo planetary entry. Charring ablation experienced during atmospheric entry is a complex process involving heat and mass transfer, and codes that predict it require a number of coupled submodels, each of which requires validation (Smits et al., 2009). For example, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) codes require models of the turbulent transport of ablation products; however, suitable scalar-velocity data under relevant conditions are very rare (Ho et al., 2007). Additioanlly, Stogner et al. (2011) conducted an uncertainty analysis of ablation calculations and concluded that turbulence models are one of the largest contributors to the uncertainty of ablation predictions for re-entry flows. A technique has been under development at The University of Texas at Austin that uses planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) of a low-temperature sublimating ablator (naphthalene) to enable visualization of the ablation products in a hypersonic flow (Lochman, 2010; Buxton et al., 2012; Combs et al., 2014a; Combs et al., 2014b; Combs and Clemens, 2015). Lochman (2010) first used naphthalene PLIF to study the transport of ablation products in a Mach 5 turbulent boundary layer. In his work, the technique provided images of naphthalene vapor in the turbulent boundary layer with excellent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), visualizing both large and small-scale turbulent structures. However, while some spectroscopic measurements were made, a temperature correction was only applied to the profile of the naphthalene boundary layer to yield a “corrected” profile and the images presented are qualitative visualizations. Additionally, no velocity data was collected. In the work by Buxton et al. (2012), naphthalene PLIF was performed simultaneously with particle image velocimetry (PIV) in a Mach 5 turbulent boundary layer using the same insert design as Lochman, providing scalar-velocity data of ablation-products transport in the boundary layer. Mean and instantaneous boundary layer profiles of velocity, RMS velocity, and fluorescence signal were determined. The results indicated that there was a strong correlation of high fluorescence signal with negative streamwise and positive spanwise velocity fluctuations away from the wall. However, naphthalene concentration was not determined from the PLIF images since the PLIF signals were not corrected for temperature effects and the PLIF images had a low SNR. Combs et al. (2014a, 2014b) used naphthalene PLIF to image ablation-products transport from the heat shield of an Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) model in a Mach 5 flow. Still, these images were purely qualitative flow visualizations with no attempt made to correct the PLIF signal for temperature and pressure effects and no velocity data was collected. Most recently, Combs and June 30 July 3, 2015 Melbourne, Australia 9 5C-2","PeriodicalId":196124,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp9.950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The dispersion of a passive scalar in a Mach 5 turbulent boundary layer is investigated using a lowtemperature sublimating ablator (naphthalene). Twodimensional fields of naphthalene mole fraction and velocity are obtained by using simultaneous particle image velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF). The images show large-scale naphthalene vapor structures that coincide with regions of relatively low streamwise velocity. Additionally, the covariance of naphthalene mole fraction with velocity indicates that an ejection mechanism is transporting low-momentum, highscalar-concentration fluid away from the wall, resulting in the protrusions of naphthalene vapor evident in the instantaneous PLIF images. Mean profiles of streamwise velocity and naphthalene mole fraction are also presented, with the mean mole fraction profile having the expected shape of a classical scalar boundary layer profile. INTRODUCTION There remains continued interest in the study of ablation owing to the need to develop suitable thermal protection systems (TPS) for spacecraft that undergo planetary entry. Charring ablation experienced during atmospheric entry is a complex process involving heat and mass transfer, and codes that predict it require a number of coupled submodels, each of which requires validation (Smits et al., 2009). For example, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) codes require models of the turbulent transport of ablation products; however, suitable scalar-velocity data under relevant conditions are very rare (Ho et al., 2007). Additioanlly, Stogner et al. (2011) conducted an uncertainty analysis of ablation calculations and concluded that turbulence models are one of the largest contributors to the uncertainty of ablation predictions for re-entry flows. A technique has been under development at The University of Texas at Austin that uses planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) of a low-temperature sublimating ablator (naphthalene) to enable visualization of the ablation products in a hypersonic flow (Lochman, 2010; Buxton et al., 2012; Combs et al., 2014a; Combs et al., 2014b; Combs and Clemens, 2015). Lochman (2010) first used naphthalene PLIF to study the transport of ablation products in a Mach 5 turbulent boundary layer. In his work, the technique provided images of naphthalene vapor in the turbulent boundary layer with excellent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), visualizing both large and small-scale turbulent structures. However, while some spectroscopic measurements were made, a temperature correction was only applied to the profile of the naphthalene boundary layer to yield a “corrected” profile and the images presented are qualitative visualizations. Additionally, no velocity data was collected. In the work by Buxton et al. (2012), naphthalene PLIF was performed simultaneously with particle image velocimetry (PIV) in a Mach 5 turbulent boundary layer using the same insert design as Lochman, providing scalar-velocity data of ablation-products transport in the boundary layer. Mean and instantaneous boundary layer profiles of velocity, RMS velocity, and fluorescence signal were determined. The results indicated that there was a strong correlation of high fluorescence signal with negative streamwise and positive spanwise velocity fluctuations away from the wall. However, naphthalene concentration was not determined from the PLIF images since the PLIF signals were not corrected for temperature effects and the PLIF images had a low SNR. Combs et al. (2014a, 2014b) used naphthalene PLIF to image ablation-products transport from the heat shield of an Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) model in a Mach 5 flow. Still, these images were purely qualitative flow visualizations with no attempt made to correct the PLIF signal for temperature and pressure effects and no velocity data was collected. Most recently, Combs and June 30 July 3, 2015 Melbourne, Australia 9 5C-2
用低温升华烧蚀器(萘)研究了被动标量在5马赫湍流边界层中的色散。采用同步粒子图像测速法(PIV)和平面激光诱导荧光法(PLIF)获得了萘摩尔分数和速度的二维场。图像显示了大尺度的萘蒸汽结构与相对较低的流向速度区域相吻合。此外,萘摩尔分数与速度的协方差表明,抛射机制将低动量、高标度浓度的流体从壁面输送出去,导致瞬时PLIF图像中明显的萘蒸气突出。给出了流速和萘摩尔分数的平均剖面,平均摩尔分数具有经典标量边界层剖面的预期形状。由于需要为进入行星的航天器开发合适的热保护系统(TPS),人们对烧蚀的研究仍有持续的兴趣。在进入大气过程中经历的烧蚀是一个涉及传热传质的复杂过程,预测它的代码需要许多耦合子模型,每个子模型都需要验证(Smits等,2009)。例如,reynolds -average Navier-Stokes (RANS)和大涡模拟(LES)规范要求建立烧蚀产物湍流输运模型;然而,相关条件下合适的标速数据非常少(Ho et al., 2007)。此外,Stogner等人(2011)对烧蚀计算进行了不确定性分析,并得出结论,湍流模型是导致再入流烧蚀预测不确定性的最大因素之一。德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校正在开发一种技术,该技术使用低温升华烧蚀器(萘)的平面激光诱导荧光(PLIF)来实现高超声速流中烧蚀产物的可视化(Lochman, 2010;Buxton et al., 2012;Combs et al., 2014;Combs et al., 2014;Combs and Clemens, 2015)。Lochman(2010)首次利用萘PLIF研究了5马赫湍流边界层中烧蚀产物的输运。在他的工作中,该技术提供了湍流边界层中萘蒸汽的图像,具有优异的信噪比(SNR),可以可视化大型和小型湍流结构。然而,虽然进行了一些光谱测量,但仅对萘边界层的剖面进行了温度校正,以产生“校正”的剖面,并且所呈现的图像是定性可视化的。此外,没有收集速度数据。在Buxton等人(2012)的工作中,萘PLIF与粒子图像测速(PIV)在5马赫湍流边界层中同时进行,使用与Lochman相同的插入设计,提供了边界层中烧蚀产物输运的标量速度数据。测定了边界层速度、均方根速度和荧光信号的平均和瞬时剖面。结果表明,高荧光信号与沿流方向的负速度波动和沿展向的正速度波动有很强的相关性。然而,由于PLIF信号没有对温度效应进行校正,并且PLIF图像的信噪比较低,因此无法从PLIF图像中确定萘的浓度。Combs等人(2014a, 2014b)使用萘PLIF对猎户座多用途乘员飞行器(MPCV)模型在5马赫流中隔热罩的烧蚀产物传输进行了成像。尽管如此,这些图像仍然是纯粹的定性流动可视化,没有尝试校正温度和压力影响的PLIF信号,也没有收集到速度数据。最近,库姆斯和2015年6月30日7月3日澳大利亚墨尔本95 c -2