Comparison  Between   Scheffe’s Second Degree (5,2) And Third Degree (5,3) Polynomial Models In The Optimization Of Compressive Strength Of Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete (GFRC)

K. Nwachukwu, K. Njoku, P. Okorie, I. S. Akosubo, C. Uzoukwu, E. O. Ihemegbulem, A. U. Igbojiaku
{"title":"Comparison  Between   Scheffe’s Second Degree (5,2) And Third Degree (5,3) Polynomial Models In The Optimization Of Compressive Strength Of Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete (GFRC)","authors":"K. Nwachukwu, K. Njoku, P. Okorie, I. S. Akosubo, C. Uzoukwu, E. O. Ihemegbulem, A. U. Igbojiaku","doi":"10.47672/ajce.893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This research work aimed at formulating an optimization model based on  Scheffe’s Third Degree Polynomial (5,3)  that can be used to optimize the compressive strength of Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete (GFRC), which is then compared to Scheffe’s Second  Degree Polynomial (5,2) formulation developed by Nwachukwu and others (2017) . \nMethodology: Using Scheffe’s Simplex method, the compressive strength of GFRC was determined for different ratios.  Control experiments were also carried out and the compressive strength determined. After the tests have been conducted, the adequacy of the model was tested using fisher’s f-test and the result of the test shows a good correlation between the model and control results.  \nFindings: Optimum compressive strength for the Scheffe’s (5,3) model was  obtained as 21.82 N/mm2. This is slightly higher than the optimum compressive strength for Scheffe’s (5,2) model which was obtained as 20.71 N/mm2 by Nwachukwu and others (2017). Since structural concrete elements are generally made with concrete having a compressive strength of 20 to 35 MPa (or 20 to35 N/mm2 ), it then means that optimized GFRC based on both Scheffe’s models  can produce the required compressive strength  needed in major construction projects such as bridges and  light-weight structures. \nRecommendations: Major stakeholders in the construction industry are therefore advised to use optimized GFRC as it is far cheaper and still possess the required strength needed for construction works.","PeriodicalId":148892,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Computing and Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Computing and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This research work aimed at formulating an optimization model based on  Scheffe’s Third Degree Polynomial (5,3)  that can be used to optimize the compressive strength of Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete (GFRC), which is then compared to Scheffe’s Second  Degree Polynomial (5,2) formulation developed by Nwachukwu and others (2017) . Methodology: Using Scheffe’s Simplex method, the compressive strength of GFRC was determined for different ratios.  Control experiments were also carried out and the compressive strength determined. After the tests have been conducted, the adequacy of the model was tested using fisher’s f-test and the result of the test shows a good correlation between the model and control results.  Findings: Optimum compressive strength for the Scheffe’s (5,3) model was  obtained as 21.82 N/mm2. This is slightly higher than the optimum compressive strength for Scheffe’s (5,2) model which was obtained as 20.71 N/mm2 by Nwachukwu and others (2017). Since structural concrete elements are generally made with concrete having a compressive strength of 20 to 35 MPa (or 20 to35 N/mm2 ), it then means that optimized GFRC based on both Scheffe’s models  can produce the required compressive strength  needed in major construction projects such as bridges and  light-weight structures. Recommendations: Major stakeholders in the construction industry are therefore advised to use optimized GFRC as it is far cheaper and still possess the required strength needed for construction works.
Scheffe二阶(5,2)与三次(5,3)多项式模型在玻璃纤维增强混凝土抗压强度优化中的比较
目的:本研究旨在建立基于Scheffe三次多项式(5,3)的优化模型,该模型可用于优化玻璃纤维增强混凝土(GFRC)的抗压强度,然后将其与Nwachukwu等(2017)开发的Scheffe二次多项式(5,2)公式进行比较。方法:采用Scheffe’s Simplex法确定不同配比下GFRC的抗压强度。并进行了对照试验,确定了抗压强度。检验完成后,使用fisher f检验对模型的充分性进行检验,检验结果表明模型与对照结果具有良好的相关性。结果:Scheffe(5,3)模型的最佳抗压强度为21.82 N/mm2。这略高于Nwachukwu等人(2017)得出的Scheffe(5,2)模型的最佳抗压强度为20.71 N/mm2。由于结构混凝土构件通常由抗压强度为20至35 MPa(或20至35 N/mm2)的混凝土制成,因此这意味着基于Scheffe模型的优化GFRC可以产生桥梁和轻型结构等重大建筑项目所需的抗压强度。建议:因此,建议建筑行业的主要利益相关者使用优化的GFRC,因为它要便宜得多,并且仍然具有建筑工程所需的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信