(Automated) Literature Analysis - Threats and Experiences

Yusra Shakeel, J. Krüger, Ivonne von Nostitz-Wallwitz, Christian Lausberger, Gabriel Campero Durand, G. Saake, Thomas Leich
{"title":"(Automated) Literature Analysis - Threats and Experiences","authors":"Yusra Shakeel, J. Krüger, Ivonne von Nostitz-Wallwitz, Christian Lausberger, Gabriel Campero Durand, G. Saake, Thomas Leich","doi":"10.1145/3194747.3194748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of scientific publications is increasing each year, specifically in the field of computer science. In order to condense existing knowledge, evidence-based software engineering is concerned with systematic literature reviews, surveys, and other kinds of literature analysis. These methods are used to summarize the evidence on empirical studies – or approaches in general – and to identify gaps for new research opportunities. However, executing systematic review processes requires a considerable amount of time and effort. Consequently, researchers have proposed several semi-automated approaches to support and facilitate different steps of such methods. With our current research, we aim to assist researchers to efficiently and effectively execute different steps, namely the search for and selection of primary studies. In this paper, we report several issues we identified during our research that threaten any kind of literature analysis and hamper suitable tool support. We further recommend solutions to mitigate these threats. Overall, our goal is to raise researchers’ and publishers’ awareness regarding several potential threats on literature analysis, to support software engineers in designing suitable tools for research, and to encourage the research community to solve these threats.","PeriodicalId":101597,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 13th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Science (SE4Science)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 13th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Science (SE4Science)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3194747.3194748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The number of scientific publications is increasing each year, specifically in the field of computer science. In order to condense existing knowledge, evidence-based software engineering is concerned with systematic literature reviews, surveys, and other kinds of literature analysis. These methods are used to summarize the evidence on empirical studies – or approaches in general – and to identify gaps for new research opportunities. However, executing systematic review processes requires a considerable amount of time and effort. Consequently, researchers have proposed several semi-automated approaches to support and facilitate different steps of such methods. With our current research, we aim to assist researchers to efficiently and effectively execute different steps, namely the search for and selection of primary studies. In this paper, we report several issues we identified during our research that threaten any kind of literature analysis and hamper suitable tool support. We further recommend solutions to mitigate these threats. Overall, our goal is to raise researchers’ and publishers’ awareness regarding several potential threats on literature analysis, to support software engineers in designing suitable tools for research, and to encourage the research community to solve these threats.
(自动化)文献分析-威胁和经验
科学出版物的数量每年都在增加,特别是在计算机科学领域。为了浓缩现有的知识,基于证据的软件工程与系统的文献回顾、调查和其他类型的文献分析有关。这些方法用于总结实证研究的证据——或一般的方法——并确定新的研究机会的差距。然而,执行系统的评审过程需要相当多的时间和精力。因此,研究人员提出了几种半自动化的方法来支持和促进这些方法的不同步骤。通过我们目前的研究,我们的目标是帮助研究人员高效和有效地执行不同的步骤,即寻找和选择初级研究。在本文中,我们报告了我们在研究中发现的几个问题,这些问题威胁到任何类型的文献分析并阻碍了适当的工具支持。我们进一步推荐缓解这些威胁的解决方案。总的来说,我们的目标是提高研究人员和出版商对文献分析中几个潜在威胁的认识,支持软件工程师为研究设计合适的工具,并鼓励研究社区解决这些威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信