African regionalisms: exploring the drivers and actors

W. Hout, M. Salih
{"title":"African regionalisms: exploring the drivers and actors","authors":"W. Hout, M. Salih","doi":"10.4337/9781785364372.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature on comparative regionalism has grown substantially over the past decades, mainly because of the realization that the European history of regional cooperation and integration is just one among various experiences with regionalism, and that the study of different regionalisms is necessary to overcome the ethnocentric bias that characterizes much social science practice (Acharya 2014: 649‒650). In particular the rise of the so-called ‘new regionalism’ since the beginning of the 1990s has led to increased attention to varying forms of regional order, increasingly also in a comparative perspective. Many scholars have published on regionalisms in Africa, either at the continental or the sub-regional level, and have thus contributed to our understanding of the specificities of the African context, as well as of how African experiences are similar to those elsewhere. While some scholars have paid attention to the role of asymmetries across African regions and regionalisms (see the earlier discussion in the introductory chapter), current analyses have generally not given much weight to how political, economic and social asymmetries influence regionalisms and, conversely, how patterns of regional interaction impact on asymmetrical development. In the context of this book, the purpose of this chapter is to offer an overview of the way in which scholarship on comparative regionalism may contribute to an understanding of the drivers of and actors in regionalism and their impact on asymmetrical development in Africa.1 We start with a conceptual discussion, which is aimed at distinguishing various notions associated to the discussion of regionalism. The following sections discuss the ontology of regions and regionalisms, and the drivers of and actors in regionalism.","PeriodicalId":135909,"journal":{"name":"A Political Economy of African Regionalisms","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Political Economy of African Regionalisms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785364372.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature on comparative regionalism has grown substantially over the past decades, mainly because of the realization that the European history of regional cooperation and integration is just one among various experiences with regionalism, and that the study of different regionalisms is necessary to overcome the ethnocentric bias that characterizes much social science practice (Acharya 2014: 649‒650). In particular the rise of the so-called ‘new regionalism’ since the beginning of the 1990s has led to increased attention to varying forms of regional order, increasingly also in a comparative perspective. Many scholars have published on regionalisms in Africa, either at the continental or the sub-regional level, and have thus contributed to our understanding of the specificities of the African context, as well as of how African experiences are similar to those elsewhere. While some scholars have paid attention to the role of asymmetries across African regions and regionalisms (see the earlier discussion in the introductory chapter), current analyses have generally not given much weight to how political, economic and social asymmetries influence regionalisms and, conversely, how patterns of regional interaction impact on asymmetrical development. In the context of this book, the purpose of this chapter is to offer an overview of the way in which scholarship on comparative regionalism may contribute to an understanding of the drivers of and actors in regionalism and their impact on asymmetrical development in Africa.1 We start with a conceptual discussion, which is aimed at distinguishing various notions associated to the discussion of regionalism. The following sections discuss the ontology of regions and regionalisms, and the drivers of and actors in regionalism.
非洲地区主义:探索驱动因素和行为者
在过去的几十年里,关于比较区域主义的文献有了很大的增长,主要是因为人们认识到欧洲的区域合作和一体化的历史只是区域主义的各种经验之一,并且对不同区域主义的研究是必要的,以克服种族中心主义偏见,这种偏见是许多社会科学实践的特征(Acharya 2014: 649-650)。特别是自20世纪90年代初以来所谓的“新区域主义”的兴起,导致人们越来越多地关注各种形式的区域秩序,也越来越多地从比较的角度出发。许多学者发表了关于非洲地区主义的文章,无论是在大陆层面还是在次区域层面,因此有助于我们理解非洲背景的特殊性,以及非洲的经历与其他地方的相似之处。虽然一些学者已经注意到非洲各区域和区域主义之间的不对称所起的作用(见导论章节中较早的讨论),但目前的分析通常没有对政治、经济和社会不对称如何影响区域主义以及相反,区域互动模式如何影响不对称发展给予太多重视。在本书的背景下,本章的目的是概述比较区域主义的学术研究如何有助于理解区域主义的驱动因素和行动者及其对非洲不对称发展的影响。1我们从概念讨论开始,旨在区分与区域主义讨论相关的各种概念。以下部分将讨论地区和地区主义的本体论,以及地区主义的驱动因素和行动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信