Pharmaceutical product safety recalls: A retrospective pattern analysis in a tertiary care public hospital (2003 – 2009)

N. Ismail, Muhammad Anwar Nawab Khan
{"title":"Pharmaceutical product safety recalls: A retrospective pattern analysis in a tertiary care public hospital (2003 – 2009)","authors":"N. Ismail, Muhammad Anwar Nawab Khan","doi":"10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pharmaceutical product recalls (PRs) have become rampant and increased dramatically in recent years. Decision for PR is made if there is or may be risk to the user of the product due to faulty production or medical reasons. This retrospective study was to evaluate the pattern and trend of PR incidence and to identify the major manufacturing and clinical root causes of reported pharmaceutical product (i.e. drug) recalls in one of the big and busy tertiary care public hospitals located in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Data in PR forms between January 2003 and December 2009 were recorded and analysed descriptively. Overall in 7 consecutive years, the study hospital received 74 general nation PR notices (2003: n = 17 (23.0%); 2004: 14 (18.9%); 2005: 12 (16.2%); 2006: 3 (4.1%); 2007: 5 (6.8%); 2008: 16 (21.6%); 2009: 7 (9.4%)). About 27 (36.5%) of direct PR notices involved this hospital merely. National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau issued 6.8% PR notices, pharmaceutical companies voluntary 91.9% and 1.3% unstated. Pharmaniaga Manufacturing requested PR the highest (16.2%), followed by Safire Pharmaceuticals (13.5%), Duopharma (12.2%) and SM Pharmaceuticals (12.2%). Degree III was the commonest action level of nation PR (97.3%) compared to degree I (2.7%). Among the reasons of PR include pharmaceutical physical appearance (40.5%), physicochemical parameter (28.4%), adverse drug reaction (4.1%), microbial test (4.1%), packaging (4.1%), contamination of foreign particles (2.7%), mixed up with other ingredients (2.7%) and sterility (1.3%). The highest pharmacological class of PR was antibiotic (14.9%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (9.5%), vitamins (8.1%) as well as antifungal (8.1%). The most respective frequent dosage form was tablet (51.4%), followed by injection (14.9%) and suspension (12.2%). The response periods toward PR were 39.2% < 7 days, 37.8% > 7 days – 1 month and 16.2% > 1 month. Essential actions taken by all respective parties in dealing with the specification of the pharmaceutical products to ensure drug safety and harmless drug use hence avert possible health risks to patients.","PeriodicalId":358440,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmaceutical product recalls (PRs) have become rampant and increased dramatically in recent years. Decision for PR is made if there is or may be risk to the user of the product due to faulty production or medical reasons. This retrospective study was to evaluate the pattern and trend of PR incidence and to identify the major manufacturing and clinical root causes of reported pharmaceutical product (i.e. drug) recalls in one of the big and busy tertiary care public hospitals located in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Data in PR forms between January 2003 and December 2009 were recorded and analysed descriptively. Overall in 7 consecutive years, the study hospital received 74 general nation PR notices (2003: n = 17 (23.0%); 2004: 14 (18.9%); 2005: 12 (16.2%); 2006: 3 (4.1%); 2007: 5 (6.8%); 2008: 16 (21.6%); 2009: 7 (9.4%)). About 27 (36.5%) of direct PR notices involved this hospital merely. National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau issued 6.8% PR notices, pharmaceutical companies voluntary 91.9% and 1.3% unstated. Pharmaniaga Manufacturing requested PR the highest (16.2%), followed by Safire Pharmaceuticals (13.5%), Duopharma (12.2%) and SM Pharmaceuticals (12.2%). Degree III was the commonest action level of nation PR (97.3%) compared to degree I (2.7%). Among the reasons of PR include pharmaceutical physical appearance (40.5%), physicochemical parameter (28.4%), adverse drug reaction (4.1%), microbial test (4.1%), packaging (4.1%), contamination of foreign particles (2.7%), mixed up with other ingredients (2.7%) and sterility (1.3%). The highest pharmacological class of PR was antibiotic (14.9%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (9.5%), vitamins (8.1%) as well as antifungal (8.1%). The most respective frequent dosage form was tablet (51.4%), followed by injection (14.9%) and suspension (12.2%). The response periods toward PR were 39.2% < 7 days, 37.8% > 7 days – 1 month and 16.2% > 1 month. Essential actions taken by all respective parties in dealing with the specification of the pharmaceutical products to ensure drug safety and harmless drug use hence avert possible health risks to patients.
2003 - 2009年某三级公立医院药品安全召回的回顾性分析
近年来,药品召回事件日益猖獗并急剧增加。如果由于生产缺陷或医疗原因对产品用户存在或可能存在风险,则做出PR决定。本回顾性研究旨在评估PR发生率的模式和趋势,并确定马来西亚巴生谷一家大型和繁忙的三级公立医院报告的药品(即药物)召回的主要生产和临床根本原因。2003年1月至2009年12月期间的PR表格数据进行了记录和描述性分析。总体而言,连续7年,研究医院共收到74份全国一般公关通知(2003年:n = 17 (23.0%);2004年:14人(18.9%);2005年:12人(16.2%);2006年:3人(4.1%);2007年:5人(6.8%);2008年:16人(21.6%);2009年:7人(9.4%)。直接公关通知中仅涉及该医院的约27份(36.5%)。国家药监局发布公关通知6.8%,药企自愿91.9%,未说明1.3%。申请PR最多的是Pharmaniaga制药公司(16.2%),其次是Safire制药公司(13.5%)、Duopharma公司(12.2%)、SM制药公司(12.2%)。III级是国家PR最常见的行动级别(97.3%),I级为2.7%。PR的原因包括药物物理外观(40.5%)、理化参数(28.4%)、药物不良反应(4.1%)、微生物检验(4.1%)、包装(4.1%)、异物污染(2.7%)、与其他成分混在一起(2.7%)、无菌(1.3%)。PR的药理类别以抗生素最高(14.9%),其次为非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)(9.5%)、维生素(8.1%)和抗真菌药(8.1%)。使用频率最高的剂型为片剂(51.4%),其次为注射剂(14.9%)和混悬剂(12.2%)。PR应答期为39.2% <7天,37.8% > 7天- 1个月,16.2% > 1个月。有关各方在处理药剂产品规格时所采取的必要行动,以确保药物安全和无害用药,从而避免对病人可能造成的健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信