His Bundle Pacing but not Left Bundle Pacing Corrects Septal Flash in Left Bundle Branch Block Patients

M. Strocchi, A. Neic, M. Gsell, Christoph M. Augustin, Julien Bouyssier, K. Gillette, Mark K. Elliot, J. Gould, J. Behar, B. Sidhu, M. Bishop, E. Vigmond, G. Plank, C. Rinaldi, S. Niederer
{"title":"His Bundle Pacing but not Left Bundle Pacing Corrects Septal Flash in Left Bundle Branch Block Patients","authors":"M. Strocchi, A. Neic, M. Gsell, Christoph M. Augustin, Julien Bouyssier, K. Gillette, Mark K. Elliot, J. Gould, J. Behar, B. Sidhu, M. Bishop, E. Vigmond, G. Plank, C. Rinaldi, S. Niederer","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle pacing (LBP) are novel delivery methods for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) for left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients. Septal flash (SF), an abnormal pre-ejection motion of the septum towards the left ventricle (LV) arising from dyssynchronous activation, has been shown in the past to be a robust and independent predictor for CRT response. Although small-cohort studies showed the feasibility and efficacy of HBP and LBP, the effects of HBP and LBP on septal motion have yet to be investigated. In this study, we used our four-chamber heart electro-mechanics simulation framework to determine whether HBP and LBP can correct for SF. We performed simulations in four four-chamber heart models. In synchronous and LBBB activation, simulated mean lateral septal movement from the right ventricle (RV) into the LV was -0.4±0.5mm and - 3.7±0.9mm (p<0.05), respectively. HBP reduced septal motion to -0.4±0.5mm (p=0.5 when compared to synchronous activation). In LBP, septal motion was reversed to 0.9±0.5mm and significantly different from synchronous activation (p<0.05). HBP was better able to recover septal function over LBP in patients with complete atrioventricular block.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle pacing (LBP) are novel delivery methods for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) for left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients. Septal flash (SF), an abnormal pre-ejection motion of the septum towards the left ventricle (LV) arising from dyssynchronous activation, has been shown in the past to be a robust and independent predictor for CRT response. Although small-cohort studies showed the feasibility and efficacy of HBP and LBP, the effects of HBP and LBP on septal motion have yet to be investigated. In this study, we used our four-chamber heart electro-mechanics simulation framework to determine whether HBP and LBP can correct for SF. We performed simulations in four four-chamber heart models. In synchronous and LBBB activation, simulated mean lateral septal movement from the right ventricle (RV) into the LV was -0.4±0.5mm and - 3.7±0.9mm (p<0.05), respectively. HBP reduced septal motion to -0.4±0.5mm (p=0.5 when compared to synchronous activation). In LBP, septal motion was reversed to 0.9±0.5mm and significantly different from synchronous activation (p<0.05). HBP was better able to recover septal function over LBP in patients with complete atrioventricular block.
他的束起搏而不是左束起搏纠正了左束分支阻滞患者的间隔闪光
他的束起搏(HBP)和左束起搏(LBP)是左束分支阻滞(LBBB)患者心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的新方法。室间隔闪光(SF)是由非同步激活引起的室间隔向左心室(LV)的异常射血前运动,过去已被证明是CRT反应的可靠且独立的预测因子。虽然小队列研究显示了HBP和LBP的可行性和有效性,但HBP和LBP对室间隔运动的影响尚未被研究。在这项研究中,我们使用我们的四室心脏电力学模拟框架来确定HBP和LBP是否可以校正SF。我们在四个四腔心脏模型中进行了模拟。在同步激活和LBBB激活时,右心室(RV)向左室(LV)的模拟平均外侧间隔运动分别为-0.4±0.5mm和- 3.7±0.9mm (p<0.05)。HBP使间隔运动减少到-0.4±0.5mm(与同步激活相比p=0.5)。在LBP中,间隔运动逆转为0.9±0.5mm,与同步激活有显著差异(p<0.05)。在完全性房室传导阻滞患者中,HBP比LBP更能恢复间隔功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信