The decidability of the equivalence of context-free grammar forms

Meera Blattner
{"title":"The decidability of the equivalence of context-free grammar forms","authors":"Meera Blattner","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.1979.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1975 Cremers and Cinsburg published a paper that described the notion of a \"grammar form\" or a master grammar [CG]. A grammar form enables one to group grammars into grammatical families with similar production rules. All grammars dnd grammar forms discussed both in this paper and in the work of Cremers and Ginsburg are restricted to the context free. In the publication mentioned above an open problem was posed: is the weak equivalence of grammar forms deciable'? In the 1977 Colloquium on Automata and Formal Languages in Szeged, Hungary,it was announced that Ginsburg, Goldstine and Spanier believe they have a solution to the decidability of the equivalence of grammar forms [Gi]. For the past two years they have been working on a complete manuscript of that proof. A number of years ago the author of this abstract began to work with certain constructs called \"matched languages\" which seemed to lend themselves to the solution of the equivalence problem. In the abs trac t \"Inheren t Amb ig ui ties in the solution to the equivalence problem is implicit in the results. The current abstract sununarizes the techniques and develops the specific results needed to probe the equivalence problem based on the material in \"Inherent Ambiguities.\" These ideas are summarized informally in the next paragraph. A context-free grammar form G is a context-free grammar tOgetller with a set of substitutions into ~he produc~ion rules of G or llinterpretations\" that replace terminal symbols by strings of terminals and nonterminals by nonterminals with the condition that distinct nonterminals replace distinct non-terminals. The results of such substitutions are grammars. The grammatical family of the grammar form is simply the family of languages generated by these interpretations. A grammar G = (V, ,P, S) is expansive if there is a nonterminal X in G such thatX;> llXVXW, where u, v, ware in V* and Xt>w for some WEL+. If a grammar is expansive then its grammatical family is the entire set of context-free grammars while if the grammar is not expansive its grammatical family must lie within the derivation bounded grammars. The ~erivation bounded grammars are structurally between the nonterminal bounded and the expansive grammars. Many problems which are un-decidable for arbitrary context-free grammars are decidable for the nonterminal bounded due to their underlying structure which can be characterized by scmilinear sets formed by the languages they generate [CS]. A similar type of characterization …","PeriodicalId":311166,"journal":{"name":"20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1979)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1979)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1979.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In 1975 Cremers and Cinsburg published a paper that described the notion of a "grammar form" or a master grammar [CG]. A grammar form enables one to group grammars into grammatical families with similar production rules. All grammars dnd grammar forms discussed both in this paper and in the work of Cremers and Ginsburg are restricted to the context free. In the publication mentioned above an open problem was posed: is the weak equivalence of grammar forms deciable'? In the 1977 Colloquium on Automata and Formal Languages in Szeged, Hungary,it was announced that Ginsburg, Goldstine and Spanier believe they have a solution to the decidability of the equivalence of grammar forms [Gi]. For the past two years they have been working on a complete manuscript of that proof. A number of years ago the author of this abstract began to work with certain constructs called "matched languages" which seemed to lend themselves to the solution of the equivalence problem. In the abs trac t "Inheren t Amb ig ui ties in the solution to the equivalence problem is implicit in the results. The current abstract sununarizes the techniques and develops the specific results needed to probe the equivalence problem based on the material in "Inherent Ambiguities." These ideas are summarized informally in the next paragraph. A context-free grammar form G is a context-free grammar tOgetller with a set of substitutions into ~he produc~ion rules of G or llinterpretations" that replace terminal symbols by strings of terminals and nonterminals by nonterminals with the condition that distinct nonterminals replace distinct non-terminals. The results of such substitutions are grammars. The grammatical family of the grammar form is simply the family of languages generated by these interpretations. A grammar G = (V, ,P, S) is expansive if there is a nonterminal X in G such thatX;> llXVXW, where u, v, ware in V* and Xt>w for some WEL+. If a grammar is expansive then its grammatical family is the entire set of context-free grammars while if the grammar is not expansive its grammatical family must lie within the derivation bounded grammars. The ~erivation bounded grammars are structurally between the nonterminal bounded and the expansive grammars. Many problems which are un-decidable for arbitrary context-free grammars are decidable for the nonterminal bounded due to their underlying structure which can be characterized by scmilinear sets formed by the languages they generate [CS]. A similar type of characterization …
上下文无关语法形式等价性的可判定性
1975年,Cremers和Cinsburg发表了一篇论文,描述了“语法形式”或“主语法”的概念。语法形式使人们能够将语法分组为具有相似生成规则的语法族。本文以及Cremers和Ginsburg的著作中讨论的所有语法和语法形式都被限制在上下文无关的情况下。在上面提到的出版物中,提出了一个开放的问题:语法形式的弱等价是可分解的吗?1977年在匈牙利塞格德举行的自动机和形式语言研讨会上,Ginsburg, Goldstine和Spanier宣布他们已经找到了语法形式等价性的可决性的解决方案[Gi]。在过去的两年里,他们一直在研究这一证明的完整手稿。几年前,这篇摘要的作者开始研究一些被称为“匹配语言”的结构,这些结构似乎有助于解决等价问题。在“固有矩阵”的轨迹中,等价问题的解中的重大联系隐含在结果中。当前的摘要概述了基于“固有歧义”中的材料探索等效问题所需的技术和具体结果。这些观点将在下一段非正式地总结。上下文无关语法形式G是一种上下文无关语法,它具有一组替换为“G的生成规则或所有解释”的替换,这些替换为用终端字符串替换终端符号,用非终端替换非终端,条件是不同的非终端替换不同的非终端。这种替换的结果就是语法。语法形式的语法族就是由这些解释产生的语言族。语法G = (V,,P, S)是可扩展的,如果在G中存在一个非终结X,使得X;> llXVXW,其中u, V, ware在V*中,Xt>w在某些WEL+中。如果一个语法是可扩展的,那么它的语法族就是与上下文无关的语法的整个集合,而如果语法不是可扩展的,那么它的语法族必须位于派生有界的语法中。派生有界语法在结构上介于非终结有界语法和扩展有界语法之间。许多对于任意上下文无关语法来说无法确定的问题对于非终结有界语法来说是可以确定的,因为它们的底层结构可以用它们生成的语言形成的相似集来表征[CS]。类似的描述……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信