Convalescent Plasma Infusion does not Appear to Change the Prognosis in Italian Patients Hospitalized with Sars-Cov-2 Pneumonia

G. Gessoni, G. Roveroni, L. Moro, Michela Pivetta, M. Tessarin, D. Bagnara, S. Valverde, R. Carla, Colucci Enza, Collodel Luca, R. Valle, G. Carretta
{"title":"Convalescent Plasma Infusion does not Appear to Change the Prognosis in Italian Patients Hospitalized with Sars-Cov-2 Pneumonia","authors":"G. Gessoni, G. Roveroni, L. Moro, Michela Pivetta, M. Tessarin, D. Bagnara, S. Valverde, R. Carla, Colucci Enza, Collodel Luca, R. Valle, G. Carretta","doi":"10.9734/ibrr/2023/v14i2305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This case-control prospective study aimed to describe the effects of COVID convalescent plasma (CCP) on late mortality in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia.  \nStudy Design: In this study were enrolled 214 consecutive patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia hospitalized during the fourth trimester of 2020 in Venice Prefecture (North-East Italy). admitted to COVID-19 Hospitals of our district were enrolled. \nMethodology:  Confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection was made through reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test in nasopharyngeal swabs. The severity of each patient’s clinical condition was determined considering the Berlin score radiological findings and ventilatory data.  Clinical data, risk factors and comorbidity, laboratory test reports and imaging diagnosis of all patients were recorded at hospitalization.   In Italy, during the fourth trimester 2020 standard therapy for COVID-19 Pneumonia was: NSAIDs, ventilator support, LMWH, steroids, antibiotics and antiviral drugs; 108 patients received standard therapy alone and 106 received standard therapy in combination with CCP. The endpoint was mortality at 30 days. \nResults: Patients series were comparable for gender, age, comorbidity and risk factors, Berlin score, PaO2/FiO2. Data concerning radiological findings and data concerning ventilatory support suggested a higher severity of patients treated with standard therapy plus CCP.  Mortality rate at 30 days was 30.6% among subjects treated with standard therapy versus 30.2% among                      subjects treated with standard therapy plus CCP. The mortality observed in the two groups did not differ significantly. In the present study, however, we observed a higher mortality than reported in the literature. This result may be attributable to the greater severity of the patients considered. \nConclusions: This case-control prospective study showed that in a cohort of hospitalized patients suffering from severe 19 pneumonia, the addition of CCP to the standard therapy did not impact the mortality rate at 30 days. However, we believe that further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy.","PeriodicalId":249518,"journal":{"name":"International Blood Research & Reviews","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Blood Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ibrr/2023/v14i2305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This case-control prospective study aimed to describe the effects of COVID convalescent plasma (CCP) on late mortality in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia.  Study Design: In this study were enrolled 214 consecutive patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia hospitalized during the fourth trimester of 2020 in Venice Prefecture (North-East Italy). admitted to COVID-19 Hospitals of our district were enrolled. Methodology:  Confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection was made through reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test in nasopharyngeal swabs. The severity of each patient’s clinical condition was determined considering the Berlin score radiological findings and ventilatory data.  Clinical data, risk factors and comorbidity, laboratory test reports and imaging diagnosis of all patients were recorded at hospitalization.   In Italy, during the fourth trimester 2020 standard therapy for COVID-19 Pneumonia was: NSAIDs, ventilator support, LMWH, steroids, antibiotics and antiviral drugs; 108 patients received standard therapy alone and 106 received standard therapy in combination with CCP. The endpoint was mortality at 30 days. Results: Patients series were comparable for gender, age, comorbidity and risk factors, Berlin score, PaO2/FiO2. Data concerning radiological findings and data concerning ventilatory support suggested a higher severity of patients treated with standard therapy plus CCP.  Mortality rate at 30 days was 30.6% among subjects treated with standard therapy versus 30.2% among                      subjects treated with standard therapy plus CCP. The mortality observed in the two groups did not differ significantly. In the present study, however, we observed a higher mortality than reported in the literature. This result may be attributable to the greater severity of the patients considered. Conclusions: This case-control prospective study showed that in a cohort of hospitalized patients suffering from severe 19 pneumonia, the addition of CCP to the standard therapy did not impact the mortality rate at 30 days. However, we believe that further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy.
意大利Sars-Cov-2肺炎住院患者恢复期血浆输注似乎并未改变预后
目的:本研究旨在探讨COVID恢复期血浆(CCP)对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)肺炎住院患者晚期死亡率的影响。研究设计:本研究纳入了威尼斯县(意大利东北部)2020年第四个月住院的214例连续中重度COVID-19肺炎患者。纳入我区新冠肺炎住院医院。方法:采用鼻咽拭子逆转录-聚合酶链反应试验确认SARS-CoV-2感染。考虑柏林评分、放射学表现和通气数据,确定每位患者临床状况的严重程度。记录所有患者住院时的临床资料、危险因素和合并症、实验室检查报告和影像学诊断。在意大利,在妊娠晚期,2020年COVID-19肺炎的标准治疗是:非甾体抗炎药、呼吸机支持、低分子肝素、类固醇、抗生素和抗病毒药物;108例患者单独接受标准治疗,106例患者联合接受标准治疗。终点是30天的死亡率。结果:患者系列在性别、年龄、合并症和危险因素、柏林评分、PaO2/FiO2方面具有可比性。有关放射学表现和有关通气支持的数据表明,采用标准治疗加CCP治疗的患者的严重程度更高。标准治疗组30天死亡率为30.6%,而标准治疗加CCP组为30.2%。两组患者的死亡率无显著差异。然而,在本研究中,我们观察到的死亡率高于文献报道。这一结果可能归因于所考虑的患者的严重程度更大。结论:本病例对照前瞻性研究显示,在一组重症肺炎住院患者中,在标准治疗中加入CCP对30天死亡率没有影响。然而,我们认为需要进一步的研究来评估恢复期血浆治疗的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信