Setting maintenance quality objectives and prioritizing maintenance work by using quality metrics

N. Schneidewind
{"title":"Setting maintenance quality objectives and prioritizing maintenance work by using quality metrics","authors":"N. Schneidewind","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.1991.160337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metrics that are collected and validated during development can be used during maintenance to control quality and prioritize maintenance work. Validity criteria are defined mathematically. The approach is based on validating selected metrics against related quality factors during development and using the validated metrics during maintenance to: establish initial quality objectives and quality control criteria and prioritize software components (e.g., module) and allocate resources to maintain them. The author illustrates both a case of passing a validation test (discriminative power) and failing a validation test (tracking).<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":269572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1991","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1991","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1991.160337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Metrics that are collected and validated during development can be used during maintenance to control quality and prioritize maintenance work. Validity criteria are defined mathematically. The approach is based on validating selected metrics against related quality factors during development and using the validated metrics during maintenance to: establish initial quality objectives and quality control criteria and prioritize software components (e.g., module) and allocate resources to maintain them. The author illustrates both a case of passing a validation test (discriminative power) and failing a validation test (tracking).<>
通过使用质量度量来设定维护质量目标和维护工作的优先级
在开发期间收集和验证的度量标准可以在维护期间使用,以控制质量并确定维护工作的优先级。有效性标准以数学方式定义。该方法基于在开发期间根据相关的质量因素验证选定的度量标准,并在维护期间使用验证的度量标准:建立初始质量目标和质量控制标准,并对软件组件(例如,模块)进行优先排序,并分配资源来维护它们。作者举例说明了通过验证测试(判别能力)和失败验证测试(跟踪)的两种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信