Exploring Student Readiness to MOOCs in Jordan: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach

A. Al-Adwan, Naser Khdour
{"title":"Exploring Student Readiness to MOOCs in Jordan: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach","authors":"A. Al-Adwan, Naser Khdour","doi":"10.28945/4542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: The current study has been carried out to reveal students’ readiness to utilize MOOCs at higher learning institutions in Jordan.\n\nBackground: Higher education institutions around the globe are shifting rapidly to reach learners worldwide by providing open education. In accordance with this universal effort, Jordan is committed to offering open access education that allows learners to access knowledge through the Internet and has launched one of the first Arabic “Massive Open Online Course” (MOOC) platforms in the Arabic region. Thus, students must be prepared and ready for this innovation in education. Nonetheless, MOOCs have been incessantly discussed and have faced wide criticism as an insufficient amount of research has been conducted on students’ readiness to be involved in MOOCs. The level of tertiary students’ preparation to utilize and attend MOOCs as a source of learning is unclear. \n\nMethodology: Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the proposed model of students’ readiness for MOOCs. Convenience sampling was used to distribute a paper-based questionnaire to the students of three Jordanian universities during a period of four months from May to September 2019. Out of 700 distributed questionnaires, a total of 537 responses were returned giving a response rate of 76.7%. Out of the returned questionnaires, 69 responses were reported incomplete as most of the questions (>80%) were left unanswered; these 69 questionnaires were eliminated from any further analysis. As a result, a total of 468 questionnaires were valid for statistical analysis. \n\nContribution: This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by examining the perceptions of higher education students in Jordan toward MOOCs. The current study extends the continuing debate about MOOCs with respect to determining which factors influence students’ readiness to participate in these courses. Specifically, this study investigates both the cognitive and psychological influential factors that determine the readiness of Jordanian students to adopt MOOCs. The proposed theoretical framework for this research is based on the work of Yu and Richardson, who developed the model of Student Online Learning Readiness (SOLR). SOLR is comprised of three forms of competency assumed to be important in examining students’ readiness for online learning. Specifically, these competencies are (1) social competency represent skills, capabilities, and a sense of control, which is necessary for managing social situations and developing and sustaining relationships, (2) communication competency, “the ability of an individual to demonstrate knowledge of the appropriate communicative behavior in a given situation”, and (3) technical competencies, “self-efficacy in technology”. Furthermore, the research model includes an additional competency: self-management of learning, “the degree to which a student perceives himself/herself as being self-disciplined and is able to engage in a greatly autonomous learning setting.”\n\nFindings: The results obtained from the SEM revealed that students’ readiness to accept MOOCs in their learning is significantly influenced by four types of competency: social, technical, self-management of learning, and communication. \n\nRecommendations for Practitioners: Facilitators of MOOCs should take into account that technical competency can be enhanced by recognizing that technical competency related to online learning should be developed, taught, and constantly reinforced at every educational level as a life skill. Additionally, facilitators and developers of MOOCs should be prepared to find methods to support and inspire student participation, and to recognize the importance of learning skills in the MOOC environment. Furthermore, facilitators and developers of MOOCs should increase the social presence of fellow participants in MOOCs, which in turn facilitates the attainment of collaborative learning.\n\nRecommendation for Researchers: Researchers may use well-established theories related to investigating online learning usage in exploring students’ readiness to use MOOCs. \n\nImpact on Society: A study like the current one would be beneficial for higher education institutions in Jordan to determine the key factors that influence students’ readiness and in turn develop active strategies to address students’ needs in order for them to adopt MOOCs. \n\nFuture Research: Further studies may include additional factors to better measure students’ readiness to use MOOCs. The additional factors can be revealed by utilizing a qualitative method. Thus, additional studies may employ a mixed-method approach (both quantitative and qualitative) to accurately identify additional factors that may influence student readiness to student readiness to MOOCs and to offer a more holistic understanding of readiness.\n\n","PeriodicalId":220667,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","volume":"36 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The current study has been carried out to reveal students’ readiness to utilize MOOCs at higher learning institutions in Jordan. Background: Higher education institutions around the globe are shifting rapidly to reach learners worldwide by providing open education. In accordance with this universal effort, Jordan is committed to offering open access education that allows learners to access knowledge through the Internet and has launched one of the first Arabic “Massive Open Online Course” (MOOC) platforms in the Arabic region. Thus, students must be prepared and ready for this innovation in education. Nonetheless, MOOCs have been incessantly discussed and have faced wide criticism as an insufficient amount of research has been conducted on students’ readiness to be involved in MOOCs. The level of tertiary students’ preparation to utilize and attend MOOCs as a source of learning is unclear. Methodology: Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the proposed model of students’ readiness for MOOCs. Convenience sampling was used to distribute a paper-based questionnaire to the students of three Jordanian universities during a period of four months from May to September 2019. Out of 700 distributed questionnaires, a total of 537 responses were returned giving a response rate of 76.7%. Out of the returned questionnaires, 69 responses were reported incomplete as most of the questions (>80%) were left unanswered; these 69 questionnaires were eliminated from any further analysis. As a result, a total of 468 questionnaires were valid for statistical analysis. Contribution: This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by examining the perceptions of higher education students in Jordan toward MOOCs. The current study extends the continuing debate about MOOCs with respect to determining which factors influence students’ readiness to participate in these courses. Specifically, this study investigates both the cognitive and psychological influential factors that determine the readiness of Jordanian students to adopt MOOCs. The proposed theoretical framework for this research is based on the work of Yu and Richardson, who developed the model of Student Online Learning Readiness (SOLR). SOLR is comprised of three forms of competency assumed to be important in examining students’ readiness for online learning. Specifically, these competencies are (1) social competency represent skills, capabilities, and a sense of control, which is necessary for managing social situations and developing and sustaining relationships, (2) communication competency, “the ability of an individual to demonstrate knowledge of the appropriate communicative behavior in a given situation”, and (3) technical competencies, “self-efficacy in technology”. Furthermore, the research model includes an additional competency: self-management of learning, “the degree to which a student perceives himself/herself as being self-disciplined and is able to engage in a greatly autonomous learning setting.” Findings: The results obtained from the SEM revealed that students’ readiness to accept MOOCs in their learning is significantly influenced by four types of competency: social, technical, self-management of learning, and communication. Recommendations for Practitioners: Facilitators of MOOCs should take into account that technical competency can be enhanced by recognizing that technical competency related to online learning should be developed, taught, and constantly reinforced at every educational level as a life skill. Additionally, facilitators and developers of MOOCs should be prepared to find methods to support and inspire student participation, and to recognize the importance of learning skills in the MOOC environment. Furthermore, facilitators and developers of MOOCs should increase the social presence of fellow participants in MOOCs, which in turn facilitates the attainment of collaborative learning. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers may use well-established theories related to investigating online learning usage in exploring students’ readiness to use MOOCs. Impact on Society: A study like the current one would be beneficial for higher education institutions in Jordan to determine the key factors that influence students’ readiness and in turn develop active strategies to address students’ needs in order for them to adopt MOOCs. Future Research: Further studies may include additional factors to better measure students’ readiness to use MOOCs. The additional factors can be revealed by utilizing a qualitative method. Thus, additional studies may employ a mixed-method approach (both quantitative and qualitative) to accurately identify additional factors that may influence student readiness to student readiness to MOOCs and to offer a more holistic understanding of readiness.
探索约旦学生对mooc的准备程度:结构方程建模方法
目的/目的:目前进行的研究是为了揭示约旦高等院校的学生是否愿意利用mooc。背景:世界各地的高等教育机构正在迅速转变,通过提供开放教育来接触世界各地的学习者。根据这一普遍努力,约旦致力于提供开放获取教育,使学习者能够通过互联网获取知识,并推出了阿拉伯地区首批阿拉伯语“大规模开放在线课程”(MOOC)平台之一。因此,学生必须为这种教育创新做好准备。尽管如此,由于对学生参与mooc的准备程度的研究不足,mooc一直被不断讨论,并面临广泛的批评。大学生利用和参加mooc作为学习来源的准备程度尚不清楚。方法:采用结构方程模型(SEM)对提出的mooc学生准备情况模型进行检验。在2019年5月至9月的四个月期间,采用便利抽样的方式向约旦三所大学的学生分发了一份纸质问卷。在发放的700份问卷中,共有537份回复,回复率为76.7%。在返回的问卷中,有69份回复报告不完整,因为大多数问题(>80%)没有回答;这69份问卷被从进一步的分析中剔除。结果,共有468份问卷有效,可进行统计分析。贡献:本研究旨在通过调查约旦高等教育学生对mooc的看法,对现有文献做出贡献。目前的研究扩展了关于mooc的持续争论,即确定哪些因素会影响学生参加这些课程的准备。具体来说,本研究调查了决定约旦学生接受mooc准备程度的认知和心理影响因素。本研究提出的理论框架是基于Yu和Richardson的工作,他们开发了学生在线学习准备(SOLR)模型。SOLR由三种形式的能力组成,在检查学生对在线学习的准备情况时被认为是重要的。具体来说,这些能力是:(1)社会能力代表技能、能力和控制感,这是管理社会情境、发展和维持关系所必需的;(2)沟通能力,“个人在特定情境中展示适当沟通行为知识的能力”;(3)技术能力,“技术自我效能”。此外,该研究模型还包括一个额外的能力:学习的自我管理,“学生认为自己是自律的,能够在很大程度上自主学习的程度。”研究发现:SEM的结果显示,学生在学习中接受MOOCs的意愿受到四种能力的显著影响:社会能力、技术能力、学习自我管理能力和沟通能力。对从业者的建议:mooc的促进者应该考虑到,通过认识到与在线学习相关的技术能力应该作为一种生活技能在每一个教育水平上得到发展、教授和不断加强,从而提高技术能力。此外,MOOC的促进者和开发者应该准备好找到支持和激励学生参与的方法,并认识到在MOOC环境中学习技能的重要性。此外,mooc的推动者和开发者应该增加其他参与者在mooc中的社交存在,这反过来又促进了协作学习的实现。给研究人员的建议:研究人员可能会使用与调查在线学习使用有关的成熟理论来探索学生对使用mooc的准备情况。对社会的影响:像目前这样的研究将有利于约旦的高等教育机构确定影响学生准备的关键因素,进而制定积极的策略来满足学生的需求,以便他们采用mooc。未来研究:进一步的研究可能包括其他因素,以更好地衡量学生使用mooc的准备情况。附加的因素可以用定性的方法揭示出来。因此,更多的研究可以采用混合方法(定量和定性)来准确识别可能影响学生对慕课准备的其他因素,并提供对准备的更全面的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信