A prospective study of outcome of resection anastomosis in elective GI surgeries.

Dr. Abhilash N, D. Kj, Dr. Srikanth K Aithal
{"title":"A prospective study of outcome of resection anastomosis in elective GI surgeries.","authors":"Dr. Abhilash N, D. Kj, Dr. Srikanth K Aithal","doi":"10.17511/ijoso.2021.i03.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bowel anastomosis is successful when there is accurate union with no tension.Previous literature has compared between hand suturing and stapling devices in retrospective andprospective designs with varying outcomes. In this study a comparison between hand suturing andsurgical stapling in patients undergoing bowel surgery is done. Methods: A prospective study designover a period of 12 months was conducted in 40 patients undergoing elective resection andanastomosis. Different time parameters for anastomisis procedure, time taken for bowel sounds toreturn, resumption of oral feeds, postoperative hospital stay were collected. Follow up for 30 dayspost-operative was done. Results: In total forty patients were studied out of which twenty patientsunderwent hand sewn and twenty patients underwent stapler anastomosis. Main group analysis inmean time durations between hand sewn and stapler anastomosis were respectively; 35.25 minutesand 12 minutes for anastomosis, 3.4 days and 3.35 days for return of bowel sounds, 4.08 days and4 days for resumotion of oral feeds, 9.35 days and 8.50 days for post-operative hospital stay. A sub-group analysis was also done.Conclusion: Stapler anastomosis had shorter anastomosis time andtotal duration of operation compared to hand sewn anastomosis. However no difference was seen inreturn of bowel activity, resumption of oral feeds and duration of hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":267909,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/ijoso.2021.i03.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bowel anastomosis is successful when there is accurate union with no tension.Previous literature has compared between hand suturing and stapling devices in retrospective andprospective designs with varying outcomes. In this study a comparison between hand suturing andsurgical stapling in patients undergoing bowel surgery is done. Methods: A prospective study designover a period of 12 months was conducted in 40 patients undergoing elective resection andanastomosis. Different time parameters for anastomisis procedure, time taken for bowel sounds toreturn, resumption of oral feeds, postoperative hospital stay were collected. Follow up for 30 dayspost-operative was done. Results: In total forty patients were studied out of which twenty patientsunderwent hand sewn and twenty patients underwent stapler anastomosis. Main group analysis inmean time durations between hand sewn and stapler anastomosis were respectively; 35.25 minutesand 12 minutes for anastomosis, 3.4 days and 3.35 days for return of bowel sounds, 4.08 days and4 days for resumotion of oral feeds, 9.35 days and 8.50 days for post-operative hospital stay. A sub-group analysis was also done.Conclusion: Stapler anastomosis had shorter anastomosis time andtotal duration of operation compared to hand sewn anastomosis. However no difference was seen inreturn of bowel activity, resumption of oral feeds and duration of hospital stay.
择期胃肠道手术切除吻合效果的前瞻性研究。
背景:吻合准确且无张力是成功的。以前的文献比较了回顾性和前瞻性设计的手缝合和吻合器的不同结果。在这项研究中,比较了手缝合和外科缝合在肠手术患者中的应用。方法:对40例择期切除吻合术患者进行为期12个月的前瞻性研究。收集吻合过程中不同时间参数、肠音恢复时间、恢复口服喂养时间、术后住院时间。术后随访30天。结果:本组共40例患者,其中手工缝合20例,吻合器吻合20例。主组分析手工缝合与吻合器吻合的平均时间;吻合时间分别为35.25天和12分钟,肠音恢复时间分别为3.4天和3.35天,口服喂养恢复时间分别为4.08天和4天,术后住院时间分别为9.35天和8.50天。并进行了亚组分析。结论:吻合器吻合术的吻合时间和总手术时间较手缝吻合术短。然而,在肠道活动的恢复、口服喂养的恢复和住院时间方面没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信