Smart contracts from the viewpoint of diffusion of innovation theory

A. Shpakova
{"title":"Smart contracts from the viewpoint of diffusion of innovation theory","authors":"A. Shpakova","doi":"10.17072/2218-9173-2022-1-82-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: smart contracts helps solve the problems of intercorporate interaction by providing the possibility of fast and secure automatic transactions. However, the development and application of this digital technology are prevented by a number of factors. Their analysis from the viewpoint of diffusion of innovation theory will allow developing a strategy for managing the growth of this technology. Objectives: to determine the state policy directions in the field of regulation and use of smart contracts based on the systematization of factors that prevent their wide diffusion, and assessment of the influence of key actors associated with the development of this technology. Methods: meta-analysis of studies, survey of 170 Russian companies, comparative analysis, statics and dynamics method, formal-logical method. Results: the article defines the position of smart contracts on the diffusion curve for Russian companies, and systematizes the factors that prevent the wide diffusion of smart contracts by taking into account the characteristics of innovations. Further, the influence of key actors on the diffusion process has been assessed. The state policy directions in the field of regulation and use of smart contracts are determined. Conclusions: in Russia, the only users of smart contracts tend to be innovators and early adopters, while the key factors for diffusion are the characteristics of relative advantage, organizational and institutional compatibility, and risks related to using the technology. The average level of influence of technology developers, the regulator (state authorities) and companies on the diffusion process is approximately the same. The priorities of state policy in the field of regulation and use of smart contracts should be to provide conditions for organizational and institutional compatibility of innovation, reduce the legal risks of using this digital technology, and train personnel.","PeriodicalId":204461,"journal":{"name":"Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2022-1-82-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: smart contracts helps solve the problems of intercorporate interaction by providing the possibility of fast and secure automatic transactions. However, the development and application of this digital technology are prevented by a number of factors. Their analysis from the viewpoint of diffusion of innovation theory will allow developing a strategy for managing the growth of this technology. Objectives: to determine the state policy directions in the field of regulation and use of smart contracts based on the systematization of factors that prevent their wide diffusion, and assessment of the influence of key actors associated with the development of this technology. Methods: meta-analysis of studies, survey of 170 Russian companies, comparative analysis, statics and dynamics method, formal-logical method. Results: the article defines the position of smart contracts on the diffusion curve for Russian companies, and systematizes the factors that prevent the wide diffusion of smart contracts by taking into account the characteristics of innovations. Further, the influence of key actors on the diffusion process has been assessed. The state policy directions in the field of regulation and use of smart contracts are determined. Conclusions: in Russia, the only users of smart contracts tend to be innovators and early adopters, while the key factors for diffusion are the characteristics of relative advantage, organizational and institutional compatibility, and risks related to using the technology. The average level of influence of technology developers, the regulator (state authorities) and companies on the diffusion process is approximately the same. The priorities of state policy in the field of regulation and use of smart contracts should be to provide conditions for organizational and institutional compatibility of innovation, reduce the legal risks of using this digital technology, and train personnel.
创新扩散理论视角下的智能合约
简介:智能合约通过提供快速、安全的自动交易的可能性,帮助解决企业间的交互问题。然而,这种数字技术的发展和应用受到许多因素的阻碍。他们从创新扩散理论的角度进行分析,将有助于制定管理这一技术发展的战略。目标:在系统化阻止智能合约广泛传播的因素的基础上,确定智能合约监管和使用领域的国家政策方向,并评估与该技术发展相关的关键行为体的影响。方法:文献荟萃分析、170家俄罗斯企业调查、比较分析、统计学与动力学方法、形式逻辑方法。结果:本文明确了智能合约在俄罗斯公司扩散曲线上的位置,并结合创新的特点,系统化了阻碍智能合约广泛扩散的因素。此外,还评估了关键因素对扩散过程的影响。确定了国家在智能合约监管和使用领域的政策方向。结论:在俄罗斯,智能合约的唯一用户往往是创新者和早期采用者,而扩散的关键因素是相对优势、组织和制度兼容性以及与使用该技术相关的风险。技术开发者、监管机构(国家当局)和公司对扩散过程的平均影响水平大致相同。在监管和使用智能合约领域,国家政策的重点应该是为创新的组织和制度兼容性提供条件,降低使用这种数字技术的法律风险,并培训人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书