Minding One's Business: On the How, When, and Where of Cognition

Wolff‐Michael Roth
{"title":"Minding One's Business: On the How, When, and Where of Cognition","authors":"Wolff‐Michael Roth","doi":"10.1145/3105726.3105747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Where is the mind when we mind our business, that is, when we do what we characteristically do? Is mind between the two ears and underneath the skull? Is it in the business that has been minded? Or is it somewhere else? A foray into the literature on theories of cognition (knowing, learning) has to be confusing. There is research that looks for mind in neurons and neuronal connections; other studies assume an enacted or embodied mind; others again consider mind to be in society. How we think about cognition has direct implication on when and where we look for it when conducting research, and how we go about teaching a field. If we assume a classical computer metaphor, then learning occurs when information is transferred to the brain (mind) of the learner where it is stored, and lecturing constitutes a main pedagogical modality. If we assume that knowledge is actively constructed when we engage in relevant activities, then one or another student-centered pedagogy will be the method of choice. When the metaphor is the embodied or enactivist mind, then opportunities tend to be provided for students to act with the relevant practical objects. In this talk, I work through some empirical examples to exhibit how, when, and where to look to find cognition that is not reduced to the physical body (including brain physiology) or to some non-physical mind and that is not reduced to the individual or social. Instead, the physical or mental dimensions, the individual or social aspects, are but manifestations of a thinking body that itself is invisible in the same way as the wave functions in quantum mechanics. Minding one's business, i.e., acting so that what is done is intelligible and intelligent, simultaneously is individual and social, sensuous (material, specific) and super-sensuous (ideal, universal). As a result, phenomena commonly searched for in the brain--e.g., remembering, perceiving, knowing a concept, reasoning--manifest themselves, often contradictorily, in different modes and modalities. Some implications are sketched for computing education.","PeriodicalId":267640,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","volume":"262 1-2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3105747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Where is the mind when we mind our business, that is, when we do what we characteristically do? Is mind between the two ears and underneath the skull? Is it in the business that has been minded? Or is it somewhere else? A foray into the literature on theories of cognition (knowing, learning) has to be confusing. There is research that looks for mind in neurons and neuronal connections; other studies assume an enacted or embodied mind; others again consider mind to be in society. How we think about cognition has direct implication on when and where we look for it when conducting research, and how we go about teaching a field. If we assume a classical computer metaphor, then learning occurs when information is transferred to the brain (mind) of the learner where it is stored, and lecturing constitutes a main pedagogical modality. If we assume that knowledge is actively constructed when we engage in relevant activities, then one or another student-centered pedagogy will be the method of choice. When the metaphor is the embodied or enactivist mind, then opportunities tend to be provided for students to act with the relevant practical objects. In this talk, I work through some empirical examples to exhibit how, when, and where to look to find cognition that is not reduced to the physical body (including brain physiology) or to some non-physical mind and that is not reduced to the individual or social. Instead, the physical or mental dimensions, the individual or social aspects, are but manifestations of a thinking body that itself is invisible in the same way as the wave functions in quantum mechanics. Minding one's business, i.e., acting so that what is done is intelligible and intelligent, simultaneously is individual and social, sensuous (material, specific) and super-sensuous (ideal, universal). As a result, phenomena commonly searched for in the brain--e.g., remembering, perceiving, knowing a concept, reasoning--manifest themselves, often contradictorily, in different modes and modalities. Some implications are sketched for computing education.
管好自己的事:论认识的方式、时间和地点
当我们专注于我们的事业时,也就是说,当我们做我们特有的事情时,心灵在哪里?心灵在两耳之间和头骨下面吗?是在商业上受到关注吗?还是在别的地方?对认知理论(认识、学习)的文献的一次探索肯定会让人感到困惑。有一项研究在神经元和神经元连接中寻找思维;其他的研究假设了一个制定的或具体化的思想;另一些人则认为心灵是在社会中。我们对认知的看法直接影响到我们在进行研究时何时何地寻找认知,以及我们如何在一个领域进行教学。如果我们假设一个经典的计算机隐喻,那么学习就发生在信息被转移到学习者的大脑(思想)并存储在那里的时候,讲课构成了一种主要的教学方式。如果我们假设知识是在我们从事相关活动时主动构建的,那么以学生为中心的教学方法将是一种或另一种选择。当隐喻是具体的或行动的思想时,学生往往有机会用相关的实际对象来行动。在这次演讲中,我将通过一些实证例子来展示如何、何时、何地去寻找不被还原为物质身体(包括大脑生理学)或非物质精神的认知,也不被还原为个人或社会的认知。相反,物理或精神维度,个人或社会方面,只不过是一个思考的身体的表现,而这个身体本身是看不见的,就像量子力学中的波函数一样。专注于自己的事情,也就是说,使所做的事情是可理解的和理智的,同时是个人的和社会的,感性的(物质的、具体的)和超感性的(理想的、普遍的)。因此,通常在大脑中搜索的现象——例如:记忆、感知、认识一个概念、推理——往往以不同的模式和方式相互矛盾地表现出来。本文概述了计算机教育的一些含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信