OPTIMAL RETROFIT SELECTION FOR SEISMICALLY-DEFICIENT RC BUILDINGS BASED ON SIMPLIFIED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

R. Gentile, C. Galasso
{"title":"OPTIMAL RETROFIT SELECTION FOR SEISMICALLY-DEFICIENT RC BUILDINGS BASED ON SIMPLIFIED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT","authors":"R. Gentile, C. Galasso","doi":"10.7712/120119.6986.19675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study deals with the selection of optimal retrofit solutions for seismically-deficient Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings. To this aim, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis is used. A discussion on the retrofit design strategy is first presented, recommending \ndesigning each retrofit solution for the same expected damage state under the design-level \nearthquake-induced ground-motion spectrum. Secondly, it is argued to explicitly consider seismic economic losses as a decision criterion. To this aim, seismic fragility/vulnerability relationships are derived for the structure of interest retrofitted with different techniques and \nconsidering a large suite of ground-motion records. Simplified-yet-accurate non-linear static \nprocedures are used as an alternative to non-linear time-history analysis to reduce the challenges in building detailed numerical models, computational demand, and results interpretation. Specifically, three increasingly-refined structural analysis methods are adopted to derive \nfragility/vulnerability curves: the Simple Lateral Mechanism Analysis (SLaMA), which is an \nanalytical approach; numerical pushover; and non-linear time-history analysis. A seismicallydeficient RC school index building, with construction details typical of developing countries, is \nused for illustrative purposes. The case-study structure is retrofitted through concrete jacketing, addition of concrete walls, and addition of steel braces, all designed through Direct Displacement-Based Design. The MCDM analysis is performed adopting, among other criteria, \nintensity-based losses derived with the three considered analysis methods, using state-of-theart, advanced ground-motion intensity measures. The results show that the ranking of the retrofit alternatives is rather insensitive to the adopted analysis method, even if the considered \nweight for the seismic loss criterion is relatively high (30% in this example). Findings from this \nstudy suggest that simplified analysis methods can be effectively employed in the preliminary/conceptual design of retrofit solutions for seismically-deficient buildings.","PeriodicalId":414988,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7712/120119.6986.19675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study deals with the selection of optimal retrofit solutions for seismically-deficient Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings. To this aim, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis is used. A discussion on the retrofit design strategy is first presented, recommending designing each retrofit solution for the same expected damage state under the design-level earthquake-induced ground-motion spectrum. Secondly, it is argued to explicitly consider seismic economic losses as a decision criterion. To this aim, seismic fragility/vulnerability relationships are derived for the structure of interest retrofitted with different techniques and considering a large suite of ground-motion records. Simplified-yet-accurate non-linear static procedures are used as an alternative to non-linear time-history analysis to reduce the challenges in building detailed numerical models, computational demand, and results interpretation. Specifically, three increasingly-refined structural analysis methods are adopted to derive fragility/vulnerability curves: the Simple Lateral Mechanism Analysis (SLaMA), which is an analytical approach; numerical pushover; and non-linear time-history analysis. A seismicallydeficient RC school index building, with construction details typical of developing countries, is used for illustrative purposes. The case-study structure is retrofitted through concrete jacketing, addition of concrete walls, and addition of steel braces, all designed through Direct Displacement-Based Design. The MCDM analysis is performed adopting, among other criteria, intensity-based losses derived with the three considered analysis methods, using state-of-theart, advanced ground-motion intensity measures. The results show that the ranking of the retrofit alternatives is rather insensitive to the adopted analysis method, even if the considered weight for the seismic loss criterion is relatively high (30% in this example). Findings from this study suggest that simplified analysis methods can be effectively employed in the preliminary/conceptual design of retrofit solutions for seismically-deficient buildings.
基于简化性能评价的地震缺陷钢筋混凝土建筑优化改造选择
本研究涉及地震缺陷钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑的最佳改造方案的选择。为此,采用了多准则决策(MCDM)分析。首先对改造设计策略进行了讨论,建议在设计级地震诱发地震动谱下,针对相同的预期损伤状态设计每一种改造方案。其次,明确将地震经济损失作为决策标准。为此,通过不同的技术改造和考虑大量的地面运动记录,得出了感兴趣的结构的地震易损性/脆弱性关系。简化但精确的非线性静态过程被用作非线性时程分析的替代方案,以减少构建详细数值模型、计算需求和结果解释方面的挑战。具体而言,采用了三种日益完善的结构分析方法来推导脆弱性/脆弱性曲线:简单横向机制分析(SLaMA),这是一种分析方法;数值容易做的事情;非线性时程分析。为了说明这一点,我们使用了一个地震不足的钢筋混凝土学校指标建筑,其建筑细节是典型的发展中国家。案例研究的结构通过混凝土护套、混凝土墙的增加和钢支撑的增加进行了改造,所有这些都是通过直接基于位移的设计进行的。除其他标准外,MCDM分析采用三种考虑的分析方法得出的基于强度的损失,使用最先进的地面运动强度测量。结果表明,即使考虑的地震损失准则权重较高(本例中为30%),改造方案的排名对所采用的分析方法相当不敏感。本研究的结果表明,简化的分析方法可以有效地用于地震缺陷建筑的改造方案的初步/概念设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信