Quality of WordPress Plug-Ins: An Overview of Security and User Ratings

Teemu Koskinen, Petri Ihantola, V. Karavirta
{"title":"Quality of WordPress Plug-Ins: An Overview of Security and User Ratings","authors":"Teemu Koskinen, Petri Ihantola, V. Karavirta","doi":"10.1109/SOCIALCOM-PASSAT.2012.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have applied static analysis to find out how vulnerable the plugins available at the official Word Press plug in directory are to well known security exploits. We have compared the amount of potential vulnerabilities and vulnerability density to the user ratings, to determine if user ratings can be used for finding secure plugins. We conclude that the quality of the plugins varies and there is no clear correlation between the ratings of plugins and the number of vulnerabilities detected in them. Indeed, an additional manual review exposed a simple but severe SQL injection vulnerability in a plug in, which has both good user ratings and a high download count. We recommend plugins to be individually inspected for typical vulnerabilities before using them in any Word Press powered site.","PeriodicalId":129526,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCIALCOM-PASSAT.2012.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

We have applied static analysis to find out how vulnerable the plugins available at the official Word Press plug in directory are to well known security exploits. We have compared the amount of potential vulnerabilities and vulnerability density to the user ratings, to determine if user ratings can be used for finding secure plugins. We conclude that the quality of the plugins varies and there is no clear correlation between the ratings of plugins and the number of vulnerabilities detected in them. Indeed, an additional manual review exposed a simple but severe SQL injection vulnerability in a plug in, which has both good user ratings and a high download count. We recommend plugins to be individually inspected for typical vulnerabilities before using them in any Word Press powered site.
WordPress插件的质量:安全性和用户评级概述
我们已经应用了静态分析来找出在官方的Word插件目录中可用的插件有多容易受到众所周知的安全漏洞的攻击。我们将潜在漏洞的数量和漏洞密度与用户评级进行了比较,以确定用户评级是否可以用于寻找安全插件。我们得出的结论是,插件的质量各不相同,插件的评级与检测到的漏洞数量之间没有明确的相关性。实际上,一个额外的人工审查暴露了一个插件中一个简单但严重的SQL注入漏洞,该漏洞既有良好的用户评级,也有很高的下载数。我们建议在任何使用wordpress的站点上使用插件之前,对它们进行单独的典型漏洞检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信