Discovering Mappings Between Ontologies

V. Sorathia, Anutosh Maitra
{"title":"Discovering Mappings Between Ontologies","authors":"V. Sorathia, Anutosh Maitra","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-849-9.CH075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge Representation is important part of AI. The purpose is to reveal best possible representation of the Universe of Discourse (UoD) by capturing entities, concepts and relations among them. With increased understanding of various scientific and technological disciplines, it is possible to derive rules that governs the behaviour and outcome of the entities in the UoD. In certain cases, it is not possible to establish any explicit rule, yet through experience or observation, some experts can define rules from their tacit knowledge in specific domain. Knowledge representation techniques are focused on techniques that allows externalization of implicit and explicit knowledge of expert(s) with a goal of reuse in absence of physical presence of such expertise. To ease this task, two parallel dimensions have developed over period of time. One dimension is focused on investigating more efficient methods that best suit the knowledge representation requirement resulting in theories and tools that allows capturing the domain knowledge (Brachman & Levesque, 2004). Another development has taken place in harmonization of tools and techniques that allows standard based representation of knowledge (Davies, Studer, & Warren, 2006). Various languages are proposed for representation of the knowledge. Reasoning and classification algorithms are also realized. As an outcome of standardization process, standards like DAML-OIL (Horrocks & PatelSchneider, 2001), RDF (Manola & Miller, 2004) and OWL(Antoniou & Harmelen, 2004) are introduced. Capturing the benefit of both developments, the tooling is also came in to existence that allows creation of knowledgebase. As a result of these developments, the amount of publicly shared knowledge is continuously increasing. At the time of this writing, a search engine like Swoogle (Ding et al., 2004)-developed to index publicly available Ontologies, is handling over 2,173,724 semantic web documents containing 431,467,096 triples. While the developments are yielding positive results by such a huge amount of knowledge available for reuse, it have become difficult to select and reuse required knowledge from this vast pool. The concepts and their relations that are important to the given problem could have already been defined in multiple Ontologies with different perspectives with specific level of details. It is very likely that to get complete representation of the knowledge, multiple Ontologies must be utilized. This requirement has introduced a new discipline within the domain of knowledge representation that is focused on investigation of techniques and tools that allows integration of multiple shared Ontologies.","PeriodicalId":320314,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-849-9.CH075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Knowledge Representation is important part of AI. The purpose is to reveal best possible representation of the Universe of Discourse (UoD) by capturing entities, concepts and relations among them. With increased understanding of various scientific and technological disciplines, it is possible to derive rules that governs the behaviour and outcome of the entities in the UoD. In certain cases, it is not possible to establish any explicit rule, yet through experience or observation, some experts can define rules from their tacit knowledge in specific domain. Knowledge representation techniques are focused on techniques that allows externalization of implicit and explicit knowledge of expert(s) with a goal of reuse in absence of physical presence of such expertise. To ease this task, two parallel dimensions have developed over period of time. One dimension is focused on investigating more efficient methods that best suit the knowledge representation requirement resulting in theories and tools that allows capturing the domain knowledge (Brachman & Levesque, 2004). Another development has taken place in harmonization of tools and techniques that allows standard based representation of knowledge (Davies, Studer, & Warren, 2006). Various languages are proposed for representation of the knowledge. Reasoning and classification algorithms are also realized. As an outcome of standardization process, standards like DAML-OIL (Horrocks & PatelSchneider, 2001), RDF (Manola & Miller, 2004) and OWL(Antoniou & Harmelen, 2004) are introduced. Capturing the benefit of both developments, the tooling is also came in to existence that allows creation of knowledgebase. As a result of these developments, the amount of publicly shared knowledge is continuously increasing. At the time of this writing, a search engine like Swoogle (Ding et al., 2004)-developed to index publicly available Ontologies, is handling over 2,173,724 semantic web documents containing 431,467,096 triples. While the developments are yielding positive results by such a huge amount of knowledge available for reuse, it have become difficult to select and reuse required knowledge from this vast pool. The concepts and their relations that are important to the given problem could have already been defined in multiple Ontologies with different perspectives with specific level of details. It is very likely that to get complete representation of the knowledge, multiple Ontologies must be utilized. This requirement has introduced a new discipline within the domain of knowledge representation that is focused on investigation of techniques and tools that allows integration of multiple shared Ontologies.
发现本体之间的映射关系
知识表示是人工智能的重要组成部分。目的是通过捕获实体、概念和它们之间的关系来揭示话语世界(UoD)的最佳表征。随着对各种科学和技术学科的理解的增加,可以推导出控制ud中实体的行为和结果的规则。在某些情况下,不可能建立任何明确的规则,但通过经验或观察,一些专家可以从他们在特定领域的隐性知识中定义规则。知识表示技术的重点是允许专家的隐式和显式知识外部化的技术,其目标是在没有这种专业知识的实际存在的情况下重用。为了简化这项任务,在一段时间内开发了两个平行维度。一个维度侧重于研究最适合知识表示要求的更有效的方法,从而产生允许捕获领域知识的理论和工具(Brachman & Levesque, 2004)。另一个发展发生在工具和技术的协调方面,这些工具和技术允许基于标准的知识表示(Davies, Studer, & Warren, 2006)。提出了各种语言来表示知识。还实现了推理和分类算法。作为标准化过程的结果,引入了DAML-OIL (Horrocks & PatelSchneider, 2001)、RDF (Manola & Miller, 2004)和OWL(Antoniou & Harmelen, 2004)等标准。抓住这两个开发的好处,工具也出现了,允许创建知识库。由于这些发展,公共共享知识的数量不断增加。在撰写本文时,像Swoogle (Ding et al., 2004)这样的搜索引擎——用于索引公开可用的本体——正在处理超过2,173,724个语义web文档,其中包含431,467,096个三元组。虽然这些开发通过大量可重用的知识产生了积极的结果,但从这个庞大的知识库中选择和重用所需的知识变得很困难。对于给定问题很重要的概念及其关系可能已经在多个本体中定义,这些本体具有不同的透视图和特定的详细级别。很有可能,为了获得知识的完整表示,必须使用多个本体。这一需求在知识表示领域引入了一门新的学科,该学科的重点是研究允许多个共享本体集成的技术和工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信