The experiences of facilitating foreign direct investment in a developing country: A comparative analysis of two local authorities

R. Marenga, L. Blaauw, O. Kakujaha-Matundu
{"title":"The experiences of facilitating foreign direct investment in a developing country: A comparative analysis of two local authorities","authors":"R. Marenga, L. Blaauw, O. Kakujaha-Matundu","doi":"10.22495/cgobrv6i4sip18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experiences of local authorities (LAs) with facilitating foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries are reported in isolation. Resultantly, there is no consolidated and comparative analysis of the above. While the impact of neo-liberalism and capitalism on the experiences of investment facilitating agencies (IFAs) such as LAs is recognised in literature (Kuswanto, Hoen, & Holzhacker, 2017; Minh, 2019), an empirical gap exists in demonstrating this impact. Using a comparative multiple case study analysis research design, this study relies on the qualitative research method to empirically compare and contrast the experiences of two Namibian LAs, Windhoek and Walvis Bay, with facilitating Ramatex Textiles Namibia (RTN) and Namibian Press and Tools (NPT) as FDIs, respectively. It similarly draws insights from the impact of neo-liberalism and capitalism on these LA experiences with FDI. Unstructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 13 purposely-selected key respondents and data were interpreted, analysed, and presented in themes. This study found that while the developmental experience of the Windhoek LA with RTN was largely negative, the Walvis Bay LAs experience with NPT was neutral. These experiences are largely linked to the neoliberalist and capitalist orientation of Namibian legislation that fails to adequately embrace sustainable FDI for local development","PeriodicalId":244517,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i4sip18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The experiences of local authorities (LAs) with facilitating foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries are reported in isolation. Resultantly, there is no consolidated and comparative analysis of the above. While the impact of neo-liberalism and capitalism on the experiences of investment facilitating agencies (IFAs) such as LAs is recognised in literature (Kuswanto, Hoen, & Holzhacker, 2017; Minh, 2019), an empirical gap exists in demonstrating this impact. Using a comparative multiple case study analysis research design, this study relies on the qualitative research method to empirically compare and contrast the experiences of two Namibian LAs, Windhoek and Walvis Bay, with facilitating Ramatex Textiles Namibia (RTN) and Namibian Press and Tools (NPT) as FDIs, respectively. It similarly draws insights from the impact of neo-liberalism and capitalism on these LA experiences with FDI. Unstructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 13 purposely-selected key respondents and data were interpreted, analysed, and presented in themes. This study found that while the developmental experience of the Windhoek LA with RTN was largely negative, the Walvis Bay LAs experience with NPT was neutral. These experiences are largely linked to the neoliberalist and capitalist orientation of Namibian legislation that fails to adequately embrace sustainable FDI for local development
促进发展中国家外国直接投资的经验:两个地方当局的比较分析
地方当局在促进发展中国家外国直接投资方面的经验是单独报告的。因此,没有对上述问题进行综合和比较分析。虽然新自由主义和资本主义对LAs等投资促进机构(IFAs)经验的影响在文献中得到了认可(Kuswanto, Hoen, & Holzhacker, 2017;Minh, 2019),在证明这种影响方面存在经验差距。本研究采用比较多元案例分析研究设计,采用定性研究方法对纳米比亚温得和克和沃尔维斯湾两个LAs的经验进行实证比较和对比,分别以Ramatex Textiles Namibia (RTN)和Namibian Press and Tools (NPT)作为fdi。它同样从新自由主义和资本主义对洛杉矶外国直接投资经验的影响中得出见解。对13名有目的选择的关键受访者进行了非结构化的定性访谈,并对数据进行了解释、分析和主题呈现。本研究发现,虽然温得和克LA与RTN的发展经验在很大程度上是负面的,但沃尔维斯湾LA与NPT的发展经验是中性的。这些经验在很大程度上与纳米比亚立法的新自由主义和资本主义取向有关,这些立法未能充分接受可持续的外国直接投资促进当地发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信