From positive and intuitionistic bounded arithmetic to monotone proof complexity

Anupam Das
{"title":"From positive and intuitionistic bounded arithmetic to monotone proof complexity","authors":"Anupam Das","doi":"10.1145/2933575.2934570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study versions of second-order bounded arithmetic where induction and comprehension formulae are positive or where the underlying logic is intuitionistic, examining their relationships to monotone and deep inference proof systems for propositional logic.In the positive setting a restriction of a Paris-Wilkie (PW) style translation yields quasipolynomial-size monotone propositional proofs from $\\Pi _1^0$ arithmetic theorems, as expected. We further show that, when only polynomial induction is used, quasipolynomialsize normal deep inference proofs may be obtained, via a graph-rewriting normalisation procedure from earlier work.For the intuitionistic setting we calibrate the PW translation with the Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov interpretation of intuitionistic implication to recover a transformation to monotone proofs. By restricting type level we are able to identify an intuitionistic theory, ${I_1}U_2^1$, for which the transformation yields quasipolynomial-size monotone proofs. Conversely, we show that ${I_1}U_2^1$ is powerful enough to prove the soundness of monotone proofs, thereby establishing a full correspondence.","PeriodicalId":206395,"journal":{"name":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2934570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We study versions of second-order bounded arithmetic where induction and comprehension formulae are positive or where the underlying logic is intuitionistic, examining their relationships to monotone and deep inference proof systems for propositional logic.In the positive setting a restriction of a Paris-Wilkie (PW) style translation yields quasipolynomial-size monotone propositional proofs from $\Pi _1^0$ arithmetic theorems, as expected. We further show that, when only polynomial induction is used, quasipolynomialsize normal deep inference proofs may be obtained, via a graph-rewriting normalisation procedure from earlier work.For the intuitionistic setting we calibrate the PW translation with the Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov interpretation of intuitionistic implication to recover a transformation to monotone proofs. By restricting type level we are able to identify an intuitionistic theory, ${I_1}U_2^1$, for which the transformation yields quasipolynomial-size monotone proofs. Conversely, we show that ${I_1}U_2^1$ is powerful enough to prove the soundness of monotone proofs, thereby establishing a full correspondence.
从正直觉有界算法到单调证明复杂性
我们研究了二阶有界算术的版本,其中归纳和理解公式是正的或底层逻辑是直觉的,检查它们与命题逻辑的单调和深度推理证明系统的关系。在正设置中,Paris-Wilkie (PW)风格转换的限制从$\Pi _1^0$算术定理中得到拟多项式大小的单调命题证明,如预期的那样。我们进一步表明,当只使用多项式归纳法时,可以通过早期工作中的图重写规范化过程获得拟多项式大小的正常深度推理证明。在直觉主义背景下,我们用browwer - heyting - kolmogorov对直觉主义含义的解释来校准PW翻译,以恢复到单调证明的转换。通过限制类型水平,我们能够识别一个直觉理论,${I_1}U_2^1$,对于它的变换产生拟多项式大小的单调证明。相反,我们证明了${I_1}U_2^1$足以证明单调证明的健全性,从而建立了一个完全对应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信