Learning While Working:: Course Enrollment Behaviour as a Macro-Level Indicator of Learning Management Among Adult Learners

Corey E. Tatel, Sibley F. Lyndgaard, R. Kanfer, J. Melkers
{"title":"Learning While Working:: Course Enrollment Behaviour as a Macro-Level Indicator of Learning Management Among Adult Learners","authors":"Corey E. Tatel, Sibley F. Lyndgaard, R. Kanfer, J. Melkers","doi":"10.18608/jla.2022.7625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the demand for lifelong learning increases, many working adults have turned to online graduate education in order to update their skillsets and pursue advanced credentials. Simultaneously, the volume of data available to educators and scholars interested in online learning continues to rise. This study seeks to extend learning analytics applications typically oriented toward understanding student interaction with course content, instructors, and peers to the program level in order to gain insight into the ways in which adult learners manage their learning progress over multiple courses and multiple semesters. Using optimal matching analysis, we identify four distinct profiles of course enrollment behaviour among 1,801 successful graduates of an online master’s program that differ with respect to course load, semesters off, and graduation speed. We found that profiles differed significantly as a function of age and knowledge background, but not with respect to gender, ethnicity, or previous academic performance. Findings indicate the utility of expanding learning analytics focused on the micro-level of analysis to the macro-level of analysis and the utility of grounding learning analytics applications geared toward adult learners in a lifespan development perspective. Implications for program design and educational interventions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":145357,"journal":{"name":"J. Learn. Anal.","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Learn. Anal.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the demand for lifelong learning increases, many working adults have turned to online graduate education in order to update their skillsets and pursue advanced credentials. Simultaneously, the volume of data available to educators and scholars interested in online learning continues to rise. This study seeks to extend learning analytics applications typically oriented toward understanding student interaction with course content, instructors, and peers to the program level in order to gain insight into the ways in which adult learners manage their learning progress over multiple courses and multiple semesters. Using optimal matching analysis, we identify four distinct profiles of course enrollment behaviour among 1,801 successful graduates of an online master’s program that differ with respect to course load, semesters off, and graduation speed. We found that profiles differed significantly as a function of age and knowledge background, but not with respect to gender, ethnicity, or previous academic performance. Findings indicate the utility of expanding learning analytics focused on the micro-level of analysis to the macro-level of analysis and the utility of grounding learning analytics applications geared toward adult learners in a lifespan development perspective. Implications for program design and educational interventions are discussed.
边工作边学习:作为成人学习者学习管理宏观层面指标的课程注册行为
随着对终身学习需求的增加,许多在职成年人已经转向在线研究生教育,以更新他们的技能和追求更高的证书。与此同时,对在线学习感兴趣的教育工作者和学者可以获得的数据量也在不断增加。本研究旨在将学习分析应用程序扩展到项目层面,以了解学生与课程内容、教师和同伴的互动,从而深入了解成人学习者在多门课程和多个学期中管理学习进度的方式。通过最优匹配分析,我们确定了1801名在线硕士课程成功毕业生的四种不同的课程注册行为特征,这些特征在课程负荷、学期休假和毕业速度方面存在差异。我们发现,随着年龄和知识背景的不同,个人资料的差异很大,但与性别、种族或以前的学习成绩无关。研究结果表明,将专注于微观分析的学习分析扩展到宏观分析的效用,以及从终身发展的角度面向成人学习者的基础学习分析应用的效用。讨论了程序设计和教育干预的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信