A Survey of Intelligence Analysts' Perceptions of Analytic Tools

Mandeep K. Dhami
{"title":"A Survey of Intelligence Analysts' Perceptions of Analytic Tools","authors":"Mandeep K. Dhami","doi":"10.1109/EISIC.2017.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a survey of 278 intelligence analysts' views of fully operational analytic technologies and their newly developed replacements. It was found that usability was an important concept in analysts' reasons for and against using analytic tools. The perceived usability of a tool was not necessarily indicative of its perceived usefulness. Analysts' decisions to recommend an analytic tool to others were best predicted by how usable analysts perceived the tool to be rather than how useful they considered the tool to be. These findings have implications for the development and implementation of new analytic technologies in the intelligence community.","PeriodicalId":436947,"journal":{"name":"2017 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2017.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article presents a survey of 278 intelligence analysts' views of fully operational analytic technologies and their newly developed replacements. It was found that usability was an important concept in analysts' reasons for and against using analytic tools. The perceived usability of a tool was not necessarily indicative of its perceived usefulness. Analysts' decisions to recommend an analytic tool to others were best predicted by how usable analysts perceived the tool to be rather than how useful they considered the tool to be. These findings have implications for the development and implementation of new analytic technologies in the intelligence community.
情报分析员对分析工具的看法的调查
本文对278名情报分析人员对完全可操作的分析技术及其新开发的替代品的看法进行了调查。研究发现,可用性是分析人员支持和反对使用分析工具的一个重要概念。工具的感知可用性并不一定表明它的感知有用性。分析师向其他人推荐分析工具的决定最好是通过分析师认为该工具的可用性而不是他们认为该工具有多有用来预测的。这些发现对情报界新分析技术的发展和实施具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信