Russian double annexation and the issue of religious consciousness in post‑soviet Georgian music

Gvantsa Ghvinjilia
{"title":"Russian double annexation and the issue of religious consciousness in post‑soviet Georgian music","authors":"Gvantsa Ghvinjilia","doi":"10.34064/khnum2-30.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the сonsequences of Russian double annexation in post-modern and post-avant-garde Georgian music. As a result of the research, it was determined that Russian annexation changed the natural path of development of Georgian music. It is a well-known fact that in order to establish a national composition school, first of all, it is necessary to rely on the roots of national professional music (which in any case originates from the church music of a particular nation) from a stylistic point of view. As Georgian Orthodox chanting was chased from the Georgian Сhurch, they were completely unknown to first generation of Georgian composers. That is why the first Georgian composers were not honored to be the founders of the national composition school, and this became a historical misfortune of the first Georgian patriotic artists. During second annexation, due to the regime’s rejection of the Christian religion, Georgian composers were unabled to address the stylistic-intonational characteristics of Georgian chants. During the Soviet period, the regime banned music with religious content, and the use of church genres, as well as religious themes or church hymns in any genre of music. After the collapsing regime, the requirement to ban church genres or religious music was canceled, and it turned out that composers are often interested in religious themes and intensively refer to the stylistic and intonation, and mode characteristics of Georgian chants. Compositions of Maka Virsaladze and Eka Chabashvili are clear examples of it.","PeriodicalId":302721,"journal":{"name":"Aspects of Historical Musicology","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspects of Historical Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34064/khnum2-30.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the сonsequences of Russian double annexation in post-modern and post-avant-garde Georgian music. As a result of the research, it was determined that Russian annexation changed the natural path of development of Georgian music. It is a well-known fact that in order to establish a national composition school, first of all, it is necessary to rely on the roots of national professional music (which in any case originates from the church music of a particular nation) from a stylistic point of view. As Georgian Orthodox chanting was chased from the Georgian Сhurch, they were completely unknown to first generation of Georgian composers. That is why the first Georgian composers were not honored to be the founders of the national composition school, and this became a historical misfortune of the first Georgian patriotic artists. During second annexation, due to the regime’s rejection of the Christian religion, Georgian composers were unabled to address the stylistic-intonational characteristics of Georgian chants. During the Soviet period, the regime banned music with religious content, and the use of church genres, as well as religious themes or church hymns in any genre of music. After the collapsing regime, the requirement to ban church genres or religious music was canceled, and it turned out that composers are often interested in religious themes and intensively refer to the stylistic and intonation, and mode characteristics of Georgian chants. Compositions of Maka Virsaladze and Eka Chabashvili are clear examples of it.
俄罗斯的双重吞并与后苏联时期格鲁吉亚音乐中的宗教意识问题
这篇文章致力于探讨俄罗斯双重吞并对后现代和后前卫格鲁吉亚音乐的影响。研究结果表明,俄罗斯的吞并改变了格鲁吉亚音乐发展的自然路径。一个众所周知的事实是,要建立一个民族的作曲学校,首先,从风格的角度来看,必须依靠民族专业音乐的根源(无论如何都源于某个民族的教会音乐)。由于格鲁吉亚东正教的吟唱被驱逐出格鲁吉亚Сhurch,他们对第一代格鲁吉亚作曲家完全陌生。这就是为什么第一批格鲁吉亚作曲家没有被誉为民族作曲学派的创始人,这成为第一批格鲁吉亚爱国艺术家的历史不幸。在第二次吞并期间,由于政权拒绝基督教,格鲁吉亚作曲家无法解决格鲁吉亚圣歌的风格-语调特征。在苏联时期,该政权禁止带有宗教内容的音乐,禁止使用教会流派,以及宗教主题或教会赞美诗中的任何类型的音乐。政权崩溃后,禁止教会类型或宗教音乐的要求被取消,事实证明,作曲家往往对宗教主题感兴趣,并集中参考格鲁吉亚圣歌的风格、语调和调式特征。Maka Virsaladze和Eka Chabashvili的作品就是很好的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信