Towards incremental component compatibility testing

Il-Chul Yoon, A. Sussman, A. Memon, A. Porter
{"title":"Towards incremental component compatibility testing","authors":"Il-Chul Yoon, A. Sussman, A. Memon, A. Porter","doi":"10.1145/2000229.2000247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software components are increasingly assembled from other components. Each component may further depend on others, and each may have multiple active versions. The total number of configurations --- combinations of components and their versions --- deployed by end users can be very large. Component developers, therefore, spend considerable time and effort doing compatibility testing --- determining whether their components can be built correctly for all deployed configurations. In previous work we developed Rachet to support large-scale compatibility testing of components.\n In this paper, we describe and evaluate methods to enable Rachet to perform incremental compatibility testing. We describe algorithms to compute differences in component compatibilities between current and previous component builds, a formal test adequacy criterion based on covering the differences, and cache-aware configuration sampling and testing methods that attempt to reuse effort from previous testing sessions. We evaluate our approach using the 5-year evolution history of a scientific middleware component. Our results show significant performance improvements over Rachet's previous retest-all approach, making the process of compatibility testing practical for evolving components.","PeriodicalId":399536,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering","volume":"7 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2000229.2000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Software components are increasingly assembled from other components. Each component may further depend on others, and each may have multiple active versions. The total number of configurations --- combinations of components and their versions --- deployed by end users can be very large. Component developers, therefore, spend considerable time and effort doing compatibility testing --- determining whether their components can be built correctly for all deployed configurations. In previous work we developed Rachet to support large-scale compatibility testing of components. In this paper, we describe and evaluate methods to enable Rachet to perform incremental compatibility testing. We describe algorithms to compute differences in component compatibilities between current and previous component builds, a formal test adequacy criterion based on covering the differences, and cache-aware configuration sampling and testing methods that attempt to reuse effort from previous testing sessions. We evaluate our approach using the 5-year evolution history of a scientific middleware component. Our results show significant performance improvements over Rachet's previous retest-all approach, making the process of compatibility testing practical for evolving components.
迈向增量组件兼容性测试
软件组件越来越多地由其他组件组装而成。每个组件可能进一步依赖于其他组件,并且每个组件可能有多个活动版本。最终用户部署的配置(组件及其版本的组合)的总数可能非常大。因此,组件开发人员要花费大量的时间和精力进行兼容性测试——确定他们的组件是否可以为所有已部署的配置正确构建。在之前的工作中,我们开发了Rachet来支持组件的大规模兼容性测试。在本文中,我们描述并评估了使Rachet能够执行增量兼容性测试的方法。我们描述了计算当前和以前的组件构建之间组件兼容性差异的算法,基于覆盖差异的正式测试充分性标准,以及缓存感知的配置采样和尝试重用以前测试会话的测试方法。我们使用科学中间件组件的5年发展历史来评估我们的方法。我们的结果显示,与Rachet之前的全部重新测试方法相比,性能有了显著提高,使得兼容性测试过程对不断变化的组件变得实用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信