Development of an instrument to measure opportunities for imagination, creativity, and innovation (ICI) in schools

J. Renzulli, R. Beghetto, Laurel E. Brandon, M. Karwowski
{"title":"Development of an instrument to measure opportunities for imagination, creativity, and innovation (ICI) in schools","authors":"J. Renzulli, R. Beghetto, Laurel E. Brandon, M. Karwowski","doi":"10.1177/02614294211042333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the development of an instrument for examining schools as institutions where teaching practices and school structures provide opportunities and support for student imagination, creativity, and innovation, as well as initial comparisons using the instrument, using a sample of n = 5020 students and n = 268 teachers (n = 161 classes of students nested within teachers). The three five-item subscales show acceptable reliability across groups (.73–.90). Paired sample t tests indicate that, on average, students reported significantly more opportunities for creativity as compared to imagination or innovation. There were also significant differences between actual student reports and teachers’ predictions only for creativity and innovation. Students reported more opportunities for creativity and innovation than their teachers predicted. However, students reported significantly less opportunity for imagination, creativity, and innovation than their teachers’ ideals. Implications for subsequent research and practice are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":186980,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Education International","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211042333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article describes the development of an instrument for examining schools as institutions where teaching practices and school structures provide opportunities and support for student imagination, creativity, and innovation, as well as initial comparisons using the instrument, using a sample of n = 5020 students and n = 268 teachers (n = 161 classes of students nested within teachers). The three five-item subscales show acceptable reliability across groups (.73–.90). Paired sample t tests indicate that, on average, students reported significantly more opportunities for creativity as compared to imagination or innovation. There were also significant differences between actual student reports and teachers’ predictions only for creativity and innovation. Students reported more opportunities for creativity and innovation than their teachers predicted. However, students reported significantly less opportunity for imagination, creativity, and innovation than their teachers’ ideals. Implications for subsequent research and practice are also discussed.
开发一种工具来衡量学校想象力、创造力和创新(ICI)的机会
本文描述了一种工具的开发,该工具用于将学校作为教学实践和学校结构为学生的想象力、创造力和创新提供机会和支持的机构,以及使用该工具进行初步比较,使用n = 5020名学生和n = 268名教师(n = 161个班级的学生嵌套在教师中)的样本。三个五项分量表在组间显示可接受的信度(0.73 - 0.90)。配对样本t检验表明,平均而言,与想象或创新相比,学生报告的创造力机会明显更多。学生的实际报告和教师的预测之间也存在显著差异,只有创造力和创新。学生们报告的创造和革新的机会比老师预测的要多。然而,学生们报告的想象力、创造力和创新的机会明显少于他们老师的理想。本文还讨论了对后续研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信