Why do Internet Devices Remain Vulnerable? A Survey with System Administrators

T. Bondar, Hala Assal, A. Abdou
{"title":"Why do Internet Devices Remain Vulnerable? A Survey with System Administrators","authors":"T. Bondar, Hala Assal, A. Abdou","doi":"10.14722/madweb.2023.23043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—In efforts to understand the reasons behind Internet-connected devices remaining vulnerable for a long time, previous literature analyzed the effectiveness of large-scale vul- nerability notifications on remediation rates. Herein we focus on the perspective of system administrators. Through an online sur- vey study with 89 system administrators worldwide, we investigate factors affecting their decisions to remediate or ignore a security vulnerability. We use Censys to find servers with vulnerable public-facing services, extract the abuse contact information from WHOIS, and email an invitation to fill out the survey. We found no evidence that awareness of the existence of a vulnerability affects remediation plans, which explains the consistently small remediation rates following notification campaigns conducted in previous research. More interestingly, participants did not agree on a specific factor as the primary cause for lack of remediation. Many factors appeared roughly equally important, including backwards compatibility, technical knowledge, available resources, and motive to remediate.","PeriodicalId":205270,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2023 Workshop on Measurements, Attacks, and Defenses for the Web","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2023 Workshop on Measurements, Attacks, and Defenses for the Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14722/madweb.2023.23043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

—In efforts to understand the reasons behind Internet-connected devices remaining vulnerable for a long time, previous literature analyzed the effectiveness of large-scale vul- nerability notifications on remediation rates. Herein we focus on the perspective of system administrators. Through an online sur- vey study with 89 system administrators worldwide, we investigate factors affecting their decisions to remediate or ignore a security vulnerability. We use Censys to find servers with vulnerable public-facing services, extract the abuse contact information from WHOIS, and email an invitation to fill out the survey. We found no evidence that awareness of the existence of a vulnerability affects remediation plans, which explains the consistently small remediation rates following notification campaigns conducted in previous research. More interestingly, participants did not agree on a specific factor as the primary cause for lack of remediation. Many factors appeared roughly equally important, including backwards compatibility, technical knowledge, available resources, and motive to remediate.
互联网设备为何易受攻击?系统管理员调查
为了理解互联网连接设备长期存在漏洞背后的原因,之前的文献分析了大规模漏洞通知对修复率的有效性。在这里,我们关注系统管理员的视角。通过对全球89位系统管理员的在线调查研究,我们调查了影响他们决定修复或忽略安全漏洞的因素。我们使用Censys查找具有易受攻击的面向公众服务的服务器,从WHOIS中提取滥用联系信息,并通过电子邮件邀请填写调查。我们没有发现任何证据表明意识到漏洞的存在会影响补救计划,这就解释了在之前的研究中,在通知活动之后,补救率一直很低。更有趣的是,参与者没有同意一个具体的因素是缺乏补救的主要原因。许多因素似乎同样重要,包括向后兼容性、技术知识、可用资源和修复的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信