Towards repeatable, reproducible, and efficient biometric technology evaluations

Gregory Fiumara, W. Salamon, C. Watson
{"title":"Towards repeatable, reproducible, and efficient biometric technology evaluations","authors":"Gregory Fiumara, W. Salamon, C. Watson","doi":"10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the proliferation of biometric-based identity management solutions, biometric algorithms need to be tested now more than ever. Independent biometric technology evaluations are needed to perform this testing, but are not trivial to run, as demonstrated by only a handful of organizations attempting to perform such a feat. Worse, many software development packages designed for running biometric technology evaluations available today shy away from techniques that enable automation, a concept that supports reproducible research. The evaluation software used for testing biometric recognition algorithms needs to efficiently scale as the sample datasets employed by researchers grow increasingly large. With better software, additional entities with their own biometric data collection repositories could easily administer a reproducible biometric technology evaluation. Existing evaluation software is available, but these packages do not always follow best practices and they are lacking several important features. This paper identifies the necessary requirements and ideal characteristics of a robust biometric evaluation toolkit and introduces our implementation thereof, which has been used in several large-scale biometric technology evaluations by multiple organizations.","PeriodicalId":404972,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With the proliferation of biometric-based identity management solutions, biometric algorithms need to be tested now more than ever. Independent biometric technology evaluations are needed to perform this testing, but are not trivial to run, as demonstrated by only a handful of organizations attempting to perform such a feat. Worse, many software development packages designed for running biometric technology evaluations available today shy away from techniques that enable automation, a concept that supports reproducible research. The evaluation software used for testing biometric recognition algorithms needs to efficiently scale as the sample datasets employed by researchers grow increasingly large. With better software, additional entities with their own biometric data collection repositories could easily administer a reproducible biometric technology evaluation. Existing evaluation software is available, but these packages do not always follow best practices and they are lacking several important features. This paper identifies the necessary requirements and ideal characteristics of a robust biometric evaluation toolkit and introduces our implementation thereof, which has been used in several large-scale biometric technology evaluations by multiple organizations.
迈向可重复、可再现、高效的生物识别技术评估
随着基于生物识别的身份管理解决方案的激增,生物识别算法现在比以往任何时候都更需要测试。执行此测试需要独立的生物识别技术评估,但是运行起来并不容易,因为只有少数组织尝试执行此类壮举。更糟糕的是,许多为运行生物识别技术评估而设计的软件开发软件包都回避了自动化技术,而自动化是支持可重复研究的概念。随着研究人员使用的样本数据集越来越大,用于测试生物特征识别算法的评估软件需要有效地扩展。有了更好的软件,拥有自己的生物特征数据收集库的其他实体可以轻松地管理可重复的生物特征技术评估。现有的评估软件是可用的,但是这些软件包并不总是遵循最佳实践,而且它们缺乏几个重要的特性。本文确定了一个健壮的生物识别评估工具包的必要要求和理想特征,并介绍了我们对其的实现,该工具包已被多个组织用于几次大规模生物识别技术评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信