Evaluation of the Impact of Different Health Education Methods in Undergraduate Students of Dental College, Mathura City

Roopali Gupta, N. Ingle, N. Kaur, Ekta Ingle, Zohara Charania
{"title":"Evaluation of the Impact of Different Health Education Methods in Undergraduate Students of Dental College, Mathura City","authors":"Roopali Gupta, N. Ingle, N. Kaur, Ekta Ingle, Zohara Charania","doi":"10.1177/2229411220160102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To assess the impact of three common lecture delivery methods viz. the lecture using pamphlet, the lecture using power-point presentation, and the lecture using audio-visual aids in undergraduate dental students of K.D. Dental College, Mathura. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 students were included in the study, i.e., 50 from each class and then divided into three different groups. Group I, Group II, and Group III used pamphlets, power-point, audio-visual aid as teaching methods, respectively. A questionnaire was designed and students were asked to fill it and also give suggestions as a part of feedback about the lectures conducted. Statistical analysis was conducted using student paired t-test and unpaired t-test, ANOVA and Fisher least significant difference post-hoc test. Results: Before intervention Group I obtained 4.38 ± 1.67 mean marks, Group II obtained 3.22 ± 1.47 mean marks, and Group III obtained 3.31 ± 1.55 mean marks. The difference found between three groups was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). After intervention Group I obtained 6.88 ± 1.88 mean marks, Group II obtained 6.06 ± 2.41 mean marks, and Group III obtained 6.00 ± 2.05 mean marks. The difference found between three groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The students preferred both audio-visual aids and power-point presentation in lectures than pamphlets. Since pamphlets were concise and get easily misplaced but other two methods were more interesting due to the incorporation of pictures, animations, etc.","PeriodicalId":116198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research","volume":"18 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2229411220160102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: To assess the impact of three common lecture delivery methods viz. the lecture using pamphlet, the lecture using power-point presentation, and the lecture using audio-visual aids in undergraduate dental students of K.D. Dental College, Mathura. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 students were included in the study, i.e., 50 from each class and then divided into three different groups. Group I, Group II, and Group III used pamphlets, power-point, audio-visual aid as teaching methods, respectively. A questionnaire was designed and students were asked to fill it and also give suggestions as a part of feedback about the lectures conducted. Statistical analysis was conducted using student paired t-test and unpaired t-test, ANOVA and Fisher least significant difference post-hoc test. Results: Before intervention Group I obtained 4.38 ± 1.67 mean marks, Group II obtained 3.22 ± 1.47 mean marks, and Group III obtained 3.31 ± 1.55 mean marks. The difference found between three groups was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). After intervention Group I obtained 6.88 ± 1.88 mean marks, Group II obtained 6.06 ± 2.41 mean marks, and Group III obtained 6.00 ± 2.05 mean marks. The difference found between three groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The students preferred both audio-visual aids and power-point presentation in lectures than pamphlets. Since pamphlets were concise and get easily misplaced but other two methods were more interesting due to the incorporation of pictures, animations, etc.
马图拉市牙科学院本科生不同健康教育方式的效果评价
目的:评估三种常用的授课方式,即单张授课、ppt授课和视听教具授课在马图拉K.D.牙科学院牙科本科学生中的效果。材料与方法:研究共纳入150名学生,即每个班50名,然后分为三个不同的组。第一组、第二组和第三组分别使用小册子、幻灯片、视听教具作为教学方法。设计了一份调查问卷,要求学生填写,并提出建议,作为对讲课的反馈的一部分。统计学分析采用学生配对t检验、非配对t检验、方差分析和Fisher最小显著差异事后检验。结果:干预前,I组平均得分为4.38±1.67分,II组平均得分为3.22±1.47分,III组平均得分为3.31±1.55分。三组间差异有统计学意义(P≤0.05)。干预后,I组平均得分为6.88±1.88分,II组平均得分为6.06±2.41分,III组平均得分为6.00±2.05分。三组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:学生更喜欢视听教具和ppt课件,而不是小册子。由于小册子简洁,容易放错地方,但另外两种方法由于结合了图片,动画等,更有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信