{"title":"In Brief: Linda Bosniak's The Citizen and the Alien","authors":"Chhunny Chhean, Chia-Chi Li","doi":"10.15779/Z38SG5B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linda Bosniak's The Citizen and the Alien provides few answers, but it does elucidate a useful framework to approach the chimera of citizenship. How are we to understand who is a citizen and an alien and how are we to weigh the pertinent policy questions for the country and its people? Bosniak posits that much of the difficulty in dealing with the issues surrounding citizenship stems from a lack of clarity over the term. She begins by asking three cornerstone questions in the context of citizenship: what, where, and whom? Bosniak first categorizes citizenship into four types: status, rights, social, and identity. The first type, status, refers to legal classification; citizenship is equated with formal legal status.' The second type is the early Roman concept of citizenship as the enjoyment of rights and privileges; one is a citizen if he or she enjoys the rights of one.2 Social citizenship is the Athenian idea of collective self governance-of \"ruling and being ruled\"-citizens are those that engage politically.3 Finally, citizenship is also a form of identity and social membership; an example would be a citizen of the world or \"a good citizen of Springfield.\", 4 According to Bosniak, citizenship is either transnational--due to the emergence of transnational corporations and issues such as global warming or infectious diseases that are not confined to a single wation's borders--or a bounded national citizenship.6 Bosniak focuses on the latter and finds that it is the most applicable to contemporary issues of citizenship and immigration. Next, Bosniak proposes three ideas to explain who is a citizen: universal, bounded, and alien citizens. The first idea describes citizenship as aspirationally universal-that everyone within the jurisdiction of that","PeriodicalId":334951,"journal":{"name":"Asian American Law Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian American Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38SG5B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Linda Bosniak's The Citizen and the Alien provides few answers, but it does elucidate a useful framework to approach the chimera of citizenship. How are we to understand who is a citizen and an alien and how are we to weigh the pertinent policy questions for the country and its people? Bosniak posits that much of the difficulty in dealing with the issues surrounding citizenship stems from a lack of clarity over the term. She begins by asking three cornerstone questions in the context of citizenship: what, where, and whom? Bosniak first categorizes citizenship into four types: status, rights, social, and identity. The first type, status, refers to legal classification; citizenship is equated with formal legal status.' The second type is the early Roman concept of citizenship as the enjoyment of rights and privileges; one is a citizen if he or she enjoys the rights of one.2 Social citizenship is the Athenian idea of collective self governance-of "ruling and being ruled"-citizens are those that engage politically.3 Finally, citizenship is also a form of identity and social membership; an example would be a citizen of the world or "a good citizen of Springfield.", 4 According to Bosniak, citizenship is either transnational--due to the emergence of transnational corporations and issues such as global warming or infectious diseases that are not confined to a single wation's borders--or a bounded national citizenship.6 Bosniak focuses on the latter and finds that it is the most applicable to contemporary issues of citizenship and immigration. Next, Bosniak proposes three ideas to explain who is a citizen: universal, bounded, and alien citizens. The first idea describes citizenship as aspirationally universal-that everyone within the jurisdiction of that
琳达·波什尼亚克(Linda Bosniak)的《公民与外星人》(The Citizen and The Alien)提供了一些答案,但它确实阐明了一个有用的框架来探讨公民身份的嵌合体。我们如何理解谁是公民,谁是外国人?我们如何权衡与国家和人民有关的政策问题?波什尼亚克认为,处理有关公民身份问题的许多困难源于对这个术语缺乏明确的理解。她首先在公民身份的背景下提出了三个基本问题:什么,在哪里,谁?波什尼亚克首先将公民身份分为四种类型:地位、权利、社会和身份。第一类,地位,是指法律上的分类;公民权等同于正式的法律地位。”第二种类型是早期罗马的公民权概念,即享有权利和特权;如果一个人享有公民的权利,他/她就是公民社会公民权是雅典人关于集体自治的理念——“统治和被统治”——公民是那些参与政治的人最后,公民身份也是一种身份和社会成员的形式;一个例子是世界公民或“斯普林菲尔德的好公民”,4根据Bosniak的说法,公民身份要么是跨国的——由于跨国公司的出现和诸如全球变暖或传染病等问题不局限于单一国家的边界——要么是有限的国家公民身份波什尼亚克着重于后者,并发现它最适用于当代的公民身份和移民问题。接下来,波什尼亚克提出了三个概念来解释谁是公民:普遍公民、有限公民和外来公民。第一种观点将公民权描述为一种普遍的理想——每个人都在公民权的管辖范围内