Problematika Pemekaran Daerah: Tinjauan dari Pembentukan Undang-Undang Daerah Otonomi Baru di Papua

Rini Maisari
{"title":"Problematika Pemekaran Daerah: Tinjauan dari Pembentukan Undang-Undang Daerah Otonomi Baru di Papua","authors":"Rini Maisari","doi":"10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss4.art6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses a number of problems arising from the division of Papua into several new provinces. The background to this problem is the judicial review of laws that have been passed, the rejection from the people and the Papuan People's Council (MRP) as the cultural representation of indigenous Papuans, and the revision of the Papua Special Autonomy Law which is considered to reduce the role of the MRP and strengthen the role of the central government in carrying out expansion. The formation of the New Autonomous Region Law was considered to have taken place in a haste: the discussion was carried out for approximately 4 (four) hours and did not address the Problem Inventory List (DIM) from the DPD, thus it was considered to be implementing a Fast Track Legislation (FTL). This is a normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study indicate that, first, the problems that arise are that the expansion was not carried out with an in-depth study and did not pay attention to the characteristics of Papua which is a conflict area. The specificity of the division of Papua which eliminates the preparatory period is predicted to cause the Papua New Guinea to become an area that fails to develop due to the unpreparedness of Papua, especially in terms of financial and economic capabilities. Second, even though the Law on New Autonomous Region was implemented quickly, it does not mean implementing an FTL since FTL is not regulated in Indonesia and the FTL that applies in other countries is only to address emergency problems where there are no clear indicators that division is an emergency matter.","PeriodicalId":141165,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Lex Renaissance","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Lex Renaissance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss4.art6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses a number of problems arising from the division of Papua into several new provinces. The background to this problem is the judicial review of laws that have been passed, the rejection from the people and the Papuan People's Council (MRP) as the cultural representation of indigenous Papuans, and the revision of the Papua Special Autonomy Law which is considered to reduce the role of the MRP and strengthen the role of the central government in carrying out expansion. The formation of the New Autonomous Region Law was considered to have taken place in a haste: the discussion was carried out for approximately 4 (four) hours and did not address the Problem Inventory List (DIM) from the DPD, thus it was considered to be implementing a Fast Track Legislation (FTL). This is a normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study indicate that, first, the problems that arise are that the expansion was not carried out with an in-depth study and did not pay attention to the characteristics of Papua which is a conflict area. The specificity of the division of Papua which eliminates the preparatory period is predicted to cause the Papua New Guinea to become an area that fails to develop due to the unpreparedness of Papua, especially in terms of financial and economic capabilities. Second, even though the Law on New Autonomous Region was implemented quickly, it does not mean implementing an FTL since FTL is not regulated in Indonesia and the FTL that applies in other countries is only to address emergency problems where there are no clear indicators that division is an emergency matter.
区域问题:新自治法在巴布亚形成的概述
本文讨论了巴布亚划分为几个新省所产生的一些问题。这一问题的背景是对已通过的法律进行司法审查,人民和巴布亚人民委员会(MRP)拒绝作为土著巴布亚人的文化代表,以及巴布亚特别自治法的修订,这被认为是为了减少MRP的作用,加强中央政府在进行扩张方面的作用。新自治区法的制定被认为是匆忙进行的:讨论进行了大约4(4)个小时,没有处理发展部的问题清单(DIM),因此被认为是在执行一项快速立法(FTL)。这是一项具有成文法和概念性的规范性法学研究。研究的结果表明,首先,出现的问题是,扩大工作没有进行深入的研究,也没有注意到巴布亚这个冲突地区的特点。巴布亚划分的特殊性消除了筹备期,预计将使巴布亚新几内亚成为一个由于巴布亚准备不足,特别是在财政和经济能力方面准备不足而无法发展的地区。第二,尽管《新自治区法》得到了迅速实施,但这并不意味着实施FTL,因为在印度尼西亚不管制FTL,而适用于其他国家的FTL只是为了解决没有明确指标表明分割是紧急事项的紧急问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信