Ethics in security research which lines should not be crossed?

S. Schrittwieser, M. Mulazzani, E. Weippl
{"title":"Ethics in security research which lines should not be crossed?","authors":"S. Schrittwieser, M. Mulazzani, E. Weippl","doi":"10.1109/SPW.2013.6914700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, several research papers in the area of information security were published that may or may not be considered unethical. Looking at these borderline cases is relevant as today's research papers will influence how young researchers conduct their research. In this paper we discuss fundamental ethical principles and their role in recent literature.We argue that the establishment of ethical guidelines or frameworks without prior discussion and consensus in the research community probably would not lead to clarity on which lines in academic research should not be crossed.","PeriodicalId":383569,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops","volume":"24 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2013.6914700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Recently, several research papers in the area of information security were published that may or may not be considered unethical. Looking at these borderline cases is relevant as today's research papers will influence how young researchers conduct their research. In this paper we discuss fundamental ethical principles and their role in recent literature.We argue that the establishment of ethical guidelines or frameworks without prior discussion and consensus in the research community probably would not lead to clarity on which lines in academic research should not be crossed.
安全研究中的伦理学哪些界限不应该被跨越?
最近,在信息安全领域发表了几篇研究论文,这些论文可能被认为是不道德的,也可能不是。研究这些边缘案例是有意义的,因为今天的研究论文将影响年轻研究人员如何进行他们的研究。在本文中,我们讨论了基本的伦理原则及其在最近的文献中的作用。我们认为,在没有事先讨论和在研究界达成共识的情况下,建立伦理准则或框架可能不会导致学术研究中哪些界限不应该被跨越的清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信