Entscheidungsunterstützung beim Medikamentenprozess: Wie umfangreich sind die hospINDEX - Stammdaten?

Sascha Karlen, Emmanuel Eschmann, J. Blaser
{"title":"Entscheidungsunterstützung beim Medikamentenprozess: Wie umfangreich sind die hospINDEX - Stammdaten?","authors":"Sascha Karlen, Emmanuel Eschmann, J. Blaser","doi":"10.4414/SMI.30.318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision-making support for the drug-order process: How comprehensive is the hospINDEX database? Systems for computerized physician order entry (CPOE) are increasingly enhanced by clinical decision support (CDS) functions in order to reduce errors in the medication delivery process. Therefore, up-to-date and quality-approved drug knowledge databases must be available, including data that is semantically structured and coded in machine-readable form. We analyzed the coverage of the CDS data from a commercially available database (hospINDEX) relative to the drugs administered to inpatients at the University Hospital in Zurich (USZ). The most comprehensive data retrieved was related to allergies and incompatibilities, pregnancy and lactation, as well as maximal doses and alerts in the context of renal and hepatic insufficiency, resulting in a coverage of 31.3% for drug orders and 45.3% for drug administrations. Lower coverage was observed for nutrition interactions, dosage adaption for renal insufficiency, and links to doping lists. Data provided on drug-drug-interactions was quite comprehensive; yet owing to its limited specificity, this functionality was primarily used by consulting pharmacologists, but only infrequently by prescribing physicians. The availability of comprehensive, machine-readable CDS data is gaining increasing relevance in advanced and quality-controlled health care services. There is thus room for improvement in Swiss drug knowledge databases, with data for selected functions only available for approximately half of the administered drugs.","PeriodicalId":156842,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical informatics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4414/SMI.30.318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Decision-making support for the drug-order process: How comprehensive is the hospINDEX database? Systems for computerized physician order entry (CPOE) are increasingly enhanced by clinical decision support (CDS) functions in order to reduce errors in the medication delivery process. Therefore, up-to-date and quality-approved drug knowledge databases must be available, including data that is semantically structured and coded in machine-readable form. We analyzed the coverage of the CDS data from a commercially available database (hospINDEX) relative to the drugs administered to inpatients at the University Hospital in Zurich (USZ). The most comprehensive data retrieved was related to allergies and incompatibilities, pregnancy and lactation, as well as maximal doses and alerts in the context of renal and hepatic insufficiency, resulting in a coverage of 31.3% for drug orders and 45.3% for drug administrations. Lower coverage was observed for nutrition interactions, dosage adaption for renal insufficiency, and links to doping lists. Data provided on drug-drug-interactions was quite comprehensive; yet owing to its limited specificity, this functionality was primarily used by consulting pharmacologists, but only infrequently by prescribing physicians. The availability of comprehensive, machine-readable CDS data is gaining increasing relevance in advanced and quality-controlled health care services. There is thus room for improvement in Swiss drug knowledge databases, with data for selected functions only available for approximately half of the administered drugs.
对药物进程的决策支持:人口指数的基准数据有多详尽?
药品订购过程的决策支持:hospINDEX数据库有多全面?临床决策支持(CDS)功能日益增强计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)系统,以减少给药过程中的错误。因此,必须提供最新的和质量批准的药物知识数据库,包括语义结构化和机器可读形式编码的数据。我们分析了来自市售数据库(hospINDEX)的CDS数据与苏黎世大学医院(USZ)住院患者用药相关的覆盖范围。检索到的最全面的数据与过敏和不相容,妊娠和哺乳,以及肾功能和肝功能不全背景下的最大剂量和警报相关,导致药物订单和药物给药的覆盖率分别为31.3%和45.3%。营养相互作用、肾功能不全的剂量适应和与兴奋剂清单的联系的覆盖率较低。提供的关于药物-药物相互作用的数据相当全面;然而,由于其有限的特异性,该功能主要由咨询药理学家使用,但很少由处方医生使用。全面的、机器可读的CDS数据的可用性在先进和质量控制的卫生保健服务中越来越重要。因此,瑞士药物知识数据库仍有改进的余地,目前所使用的药物中,只有大约一半具有特定功能的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信