The firm/territory relationships in the globalisation: towards a new rationale

Jean-Benoit Zimmermann
{"title":"The firm/territory relationships in the globalisation: towards a new rationale","authors":"Jean-Benoit Zimmermann","doi":"10.1051/EJESS:2001108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– The aim of this paper is the presentation of an approach of firms-territories relationships in terms of firms' nomadism and territorial anchorage of technological and industrial activities. Such an approach is founded on the necessity to overcome the “volatile” firm's level of analysis, in which firm's mobility is investigated from the sole point of view of the leaven location. On the contrary, it should be relevant to focus on the firm's dynamics through its connections with the whole set of territories and to conceive the firm-territory relation as a result of the dialectic confrontation of the respectively concerned firm and territory both dynamics, both trajectories. Hence we are led to characterise the localised industrial unit as placed at the crossroad of a triple link: with a firm (or a group), with an industry and with a territory. Such a threefold coupling relies on proximity's effects, alternately from organisational and geographical nature, whose conjunction generates territorial anchoring and leads to the notion of productive encounter, in the sense of a capacity to formulate and give solutions to productive issues, within the context of firm-territory relationship. In terms of formal models, research works are at the very first step. Nevertheless, an approach in terms of “small worlds” seems to present very fruitful perspectives. We develop the foundations of such an approach and expose how it can provide a good framework to explain territorial anchorage and, more widely, the strength of clusters. A concrete illustration is extensively developed about SGS-Thomson Microelectronics group with regard to its productive site in Rousset, in the French Bouches-du-Rhone district. Classification Codes: L23, L63, O18, R3, R58.","PeriodicalId":352454,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/EJESS:2001108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

– The aim of this paper is the presentation of an approach of firms-territories relationships in terms of firms' nomadism and territorial anchorage of technological and industrial activities. Such an approach is founded on the necessity to overcome the “volatile” firm's level of analysis, in which firm's mobility is investigated from the sole point of view of the leaven location. On the contrary, it should be relevant to focus on the firm's dynamics through its connections with the whole set of territories and to conceive the firm-territory relation as a result of the dialectic confrontation of the respectively concerned firm and territory both dynamics, both trajectories. Hence we are led to characterise the localised industrial unit as placed at the crossroad of a triple link: with a firm (or a group), with an industry and with a territory. Such a threefold coupling relies on proximity's effects, alternately from organisational and geographical nature, whose conjunction generates territorial anchoring and leads to the notion of productive encounter, in the sense of a capacity to formulate and give solutions to productive issues, within the context of firm-territory relationship. In terms of formal models, research works are at the very first step. Nevertheless, an approach in terms of “small worlds” seems to present very fruitful perspectives. We develop the foundations of such an approach and expose how it can provide a good framework to explain territorial anchorage and, more widely, the strength of clusters. A concrete illustration is extensively developed about SGS-Thomson Microelectronics group with regard to its productive site in Rousset, in the French Bouches-du-Rhone district. Classification Codes: L23, L63, O18, R3, R58.
全球化中的企业/地域关系:走向新的理论基础
-本文的目的是在公司的游牧和技术和工业活动的领土锚定方面提出公司-领土关系的方法。这种方法是建立在克服“不稳定”企业分析水平的必要性之上的,在这种分析水平中,企业的流动性是从发酵剂位置的唯一观点来调查的。相反,应该通过企业与整个领域的联系来关注企业的动态,并将企业与领域的关系视为各自相关的企业和领域的动态、两种轨迹的辩证对抗的结果。因此,我们被引导将本地化工业单位描述为位于三重联系的十字路口:与公司(或集团),与行业和领土。这种三重耦合依赖于邻近的影响,交替来自组织和地理性质,其结合产生领土锚定并导致生产性相遇的概念,在企业-领土关系的背景下,在制定和提供生产性问题解决方案的能力的意义上。就正式模型而言,研究工作处于第一步。然而,从“小世界”的角度出发的方法似乎提供了非常富有成效的观点。我们发展了这种方法的基础,并揭示了它如何提供一个很好的框架来解释领土锚定,更广泛地说,集群的强度。一个具体的例子是广泛开发的sgs -汤姆逊微电子集团关于其生产基地在鲁塞,在法国的bouches - dou - rhone地区。分类代码:L23、L63、O18、R3、R58。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信