Electromigration failure mechanism comparison between wafer level and package level reliability test on via structure

W. Dulin, Ong Cheng Nee, N. H. Seng
{"title":"Electromigration failure mechanism comparison between wafer level and package level reliability test on via structure","authors":"W. Dulin, Ong Cheng Nee, N. H. Seng","doi":"10.1109/ACQED.2015.7274013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wafer level reliability (WLR) and package level reliability (PLR) test methods are widely used for Electromigration (EM) accelerated lifetime test. Both methods on different via structures are studied in this paper. The experimental result shows single via terminated EM structure lifetime is comparable between WLR and PLR methods based on Black's equation; while stack via terminated structure lifetime is not homogeneous between the two methods. Physical failure analysis (PFA) also shows different failure mechanisms between WLR and PLR methods on stack via terminated structure. The hypothesis is that during WLR test, large joule heating is produced at stack via area due to W-via high resistivity. The temperature even is high enough to make the aluminum between stack vias melt or burnt out.","PeriodicalId":376857,"journal":{"name":"2015 6th Asia Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ASQED)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 6th Asia Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ASQED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACQED.2015.7274013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wafer level reliability (WLR) and package level reliability (PLR) test methods are widely used for Electromigration (EM) accelerated lifetime test. Both methods on different via structures are studied in this paper. The experimental result shows single via terminated EM structure lifetime is comparable between WLR and PLR methods based on Black's equation; while stack via terminated structure lifetime is not homogeneous between the two methods. Physical failure analysis (PFA) also shows different failure mechanisms between WLR and PLR methods on stack via terminated structure. The hypothesis is that during WLR test, large joule heating is produced at stack via area due to W-via high resistivity. The temperature even is high enough to make the aluminum between stack vias melt or burnt out.
通孔结构晶圆级和封装级可靠性试验的电迁移失效机理比较
晶圆级可靠性(WLR)和封装级可靠性(PLR)测试方法被广泛用于电迁移(EM)加速寿命测试。本文对两种方法在不同通孔结构上的应用进行了研究。实验结果表明,基于Black方程的单通端EM结构寿命与基于WLR的PLR结构寿命相当;而堆栈通过终止结构的生存期在两种方法之间是不均匀的。物理失效分析(PFA)也显示了WLR和PLR方法在端接结构上的不同失效机制。假设在WLR测试过程中,由于W-via高电阻率,在堆栈通孔区域产生了大焦耳加热。温度甚至高到足以使堆叠过孔之间的铝熔化或烧坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信