Quality of Tests on Mathematics Questions for Year-End Assessment (PAT) Class VIII at SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota

Yola Putri Anggraini, Y. Roza, M. Maimunah
{"title":"Quality of Tests on Mathematics Questions for Year-End Assessment (PAT) Class VIII at SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota","authors":"Yola Putri Anggraini, Y. Roza, M. Maimunah","doi":"10.26858/jdm.v8i3.17318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the quality of the test on multiple choice questions in mathematics for Year End Assessment (PAT) class VIII SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota for the 2019/2020 academic year based on the level of question validity, reliability level, difficulty level, distinguishing power, and option effectiveness cheater). This research is an evaluation with a quantitative descriptive approach. The research was conducted with a sample of 30 student answer sheets. Techniques for collecting data are documentation techniques. After the data is collected, the data will be analyzed with the help of Excel. Judging from the results of this analysis, it can be seen that the End of Year Assessment (PAT) questions for class VIII SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota for the 2019/2020 academic year were not carried out by quantitative reviewers. Judging from the level of validity, it consists of 14 valid questions, while the other 16 questions are said to be invalid. The PAT questions have a high level of reliability. As for the difficulty level of the questions, there are 7 items (23.33%) difficult, 18 items (60%) moderate, and 5 items (16.66%) easy. The distinguishing power is 8 questions that are bad (26.66%), 7 questions with sufficient criteria (23.33%), 7 questions with good criteria (23.33%), and 8 questions with very good criteria (26.66%) ). For the effectiveness of the option, 4 items (13.33%) were very good, 15 items (50%) were good, 9 items (30%) were bad, and 2 items (6.33%) were very bad. So that based on the results of the quantitative test, it turns out that most of the items were not of good quality for Class VIII Year End Assessment (PAT) for the 2019/2020 school year.","PeriodicalId":123617,"journal":{"name":"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"2018 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v8i3.17318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality of the test on multiple choice questions in mathematics for Year End Assessment (PAT) class VIII SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota for the 2019/2020 academic year based on the level of question validity, reliability level, difficulty level, distinguishing power, and option effectiveness cheater). This research is an evaluation with a quantitative descriptive approach. The research was conducted with a sample of 30 student answer sheets. Techniques for collecting data are documentation techniques. After the data is collected, the data will be analyzed with the help of Excel. Judging from the results of this analysis, it can be seen that the End of Year Assessment (PAT) questions for class VIII SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota for the 2019/2020 academic year were not carried out by quantitative reviewers. Judging from the level of validity, it consists of 14 valid questions, while the other 16 questions are said to be invalid. The PAT questions have a high level of reliability. As for the difficulty level of the questions, there are 7 items (23.33%) difficult, 18 items (60%) moderate, and 5 items (16.66%) easy. The distinguishing power is 8 questions that are bad (26.66%), 7 questions with sufficient criteria (23.33%), 7 questions with good criteria (23.33%), and 8 questions with very good criteria (26.66%) ). For the effectiveness of the option, 4 items (13.33%) were very good, 15 items (50%) were good, 9 items (30%) were bad, and 2 items (6.33%) were very bad. So that based on the results of the quantitative test, it turns out that most of the items were not of good quality for Class VIII Year End Assessment (PAT) for the 2019/2020 school year.
在曼谷哥打的SMPN 2年终评估(PAT) VIII类数学问题的测试质量
本研究旨在根据问题效度、信度水平、难度水平、区分能力和选择有效性(作弊者)的水平,确定2019/2020学年曼谷Kota年终评估(PAT) VIII类数学选择题的测试质量。本研究采用定量描述方法进行评价。这项研究的样本是30名学生的答卷。收集数据的技术是文档技术。数据收集完成后,使用Excel对数据进行分析。从这个分析的结果可以看出,2019/2020学年的曼谷Kota VIII类SMPN 2的年终评估(PAT)问题不是由定量审稿人进行的。从效度水平来看,它由14个有效问题组成,而其他16个问题被认为是无效的。PAT问题具有很高的可靠性。从问题的难易程度来看,有7个问题(23.33%)为难,18个问题(60%)为中,5个问题(16.66%)为易。区分力为:差8题(26.66%)、标准尚可7题(23.33%)、标准尚可7题(23.33%)、标准极好8题(26.66%)。在选项的有效性方面,非常好4项(13.33%),好15项(50%),差9项(30%),非常差2项(6.33%)。因此,从定量测试的结果来看,2019/2020学年度八班年终评估(PAT)的大部分项目质量不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信