Analysis of Writing Programs and Students’ Errors to Increase the Students’ Writing Skill

Nunung Widijantie
{"title":"Analysis of Writing Programs and Students’ Errors to Increase the Students’ Writing Skill","authors":"Nunung Widijantie","doi":"10.11114/ijecs.v6i1.5801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents the analysis of writing programs which can increase the students’ writing skill by concerning students’ errors. The method used qualitative and quantitative analyses. The participants involved in this study were 30 students of the third level majoring in analytical chemistry department in Politeknik AKA Bogor, academic year 2021/2022. The Researcher wanted to know the area of errors in each writing program. The result shows that the average of grade students got in the program of teaching reading and vocabulary was 68.75% with 31.25% error in the area of identifying the words: analysis, analyze, analytical, analyst, prepare, preparation, determine, determination, require, and statistically. In the program of teaching grammar and structure, the students’ score average was 70% which was bigger than the first program. Meanwhile the average of error was 30% in the area of using past tense, present tense, present perfect tense, modal auxiliary, passive voice, relative clause, past and present participle. In the next program, analyzing sentences from chemistry textbook, the students had difficulty in identifying main and relative clauses, and analyzing present and past participles in a sentence. The students obtained 71.25% for the average of grade and 28.75% error. In writing from simple to complex sentences, the students got score 77.5% and 22.5% error in the area of making sentences consisting of main and relative clauses and applying present and past participles as verb in a sentence. Finally, after having 4 programs stated above, in the program of writing practice report, the students got average of grade 80% meaning excellent, and 20% error in the area of interpreting data in writing and developing main idea. This research finds that the writing programs: teaching reading vocabulary, teaching grammar and structure, analyzing sentences from chemistry textbook, writing from simple to complex sentences, and writing practical report are the writing programs that can increase the students’ writing skill. To make the decision which area of writing programs needs to have more attention, it can be determined by analyzing the students’ errors.","PeriodicalId":166482,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English and Cultural Studies","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/ijecs.v6i1.5801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents the analysis of writing programs which can increase the students’ writing skill by concerning students’ errors. The method used qualitative and quantitative analyses. The participants involved in this study were 30 students of the third level majoring in analytical chemistry department in Politeknik AKA Bogor, academic year 2021/2022. The Researcher wanted to know the area of errors in each writing program. The result shows that the average of grade students got in the program of teaching reading and vocabulary was 68.75% with 31.25% error in the area of identifying the words: analysis, analyze, analytical, analyst, prepare, preparation, determine, determination, require, and statistically. In the program of teaching grammar and structure, the students’ score average was 70% which was bigger than the first program. Meanwhile the average of error was 30% in the area of using past tense, present tense, present perfect tense, modal auxiliary, passive voice, relative clause, past and present participle. In the next program, analyzing sentences from chemistry textbook, the students had difficulty in identifying main and relative clauses, and analyzing present and past participles in a sentence. The students obtained 71.25% for the average of grade and 28.75% error. In writing from simple to complex sentences, the students got score 77.5% and 22.5% error in the area of making sentences consisting of main and relative clauses and applying present and past participles as verb in a sentence. Finally, after having 4 programs stated above, in the program of writing practice report, the students got average of grade 80% meaning excellent, and 20% error in the area of interpreting data in writing and developing main idea. This research finds that the writing programs: teaching reading vocabulary, teaching grammar and structure, analyzing sentences from chemistry textbook, writing from simple to complex sentences, and writing practical report are the writing programs that can increase the students’ writing skill. To make the decision which area of writing programs needs to have more attention, it can be determined by analyzing the students’ errors.
分析写作程序与学生错误,提高学生写作水平
本研究通过分析学生的写作错误,提出了提高学生写作能力的写作方案。方法采用定性和定量分析相结合的方法。研究对象为2021/2022学年茂物理工大学分析化学系三年级30名学生。研究者想知道每个写作程序的错误区域。结果表明,年级学生在阅读与词汇教学计划中的平均成绩为68.75%,在分析、分析、分析、分析、准备、准备、确定、确定、要求、统计等词汇识别方面的误差率为31.25%。在语法和结构教学方案中,学生的平均成绩为70%,比第一个方案有所提高。在过去式、现在时、现在完成时、情态助动词、被动语态、关系分句、过去分词和现在分词的使用方面,平均误差为30%。在接下来的节目中,分析化学教科书中的句子,学生们很难识别句子中的主要分句和关系分句,以及分析句子中的现在分词和过去分词。学生的平均成绩为71.25%,误差为28.75%。在从简单句到复杂句的写作中,学生在主分句和关系分句的构成以及现在分词和过去分词作为动词的使用方面的得分为77.5%,错误率为22.5%。最后,在完成上述4个项目后,在写作实践报告项目中,学生的平均成绩为优秀80%,在写作中解释数据和发展主旨方面有20%的错误。本研究发现,阅读词汇教学、语法与结构教学、化学教材句子分析、由简到繁、实践报告写作等写作项目是提高学生写作能力的写作项目。要决定哪个方面的写作需要更多的关注,可以通过分析学生的错误来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信