Assessing and Improving the Experience of Underrepresented Populations: A Participatory Design Approach

Scott W. H. Young, David Swedman, Hailley M. Fargo, Steve Borrelli, Zoe Chao, Carmen Gass
{"title":"Assessing and Improving the Experience of Underrepresented Populations: A Participatory Design Approach","authors":"Scott W. H. Young, David Swedman, Hailley M. Fargo, Steve Borrelli, Zoe Chao, Carmen Gass","doi":"10.31229/osf.io/hr8sj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can we ensure that underrepresented populations succeed at our institutions? Participatory Design offers one answer to this question. Participatory Design is a socially-active, values-driven approach to co-creation that seeks to give voice to those who have been traditionally unheard. A team of librarians from Penn State University (PSU) and Montana State University (MSU) followed a parallel design process with two different populations: PSU worked with first-generation students and MSU worked with Native American students. Each project team facilitated a series of 10 workshops with student participants that followed a three-phase process: exploration, generation, and evaluation.•During the exploration phase, we explored topics, concepts, and problems relating to the library experience of participants. •During the generation phase, we generated ideas and potential solutions around key topics explored in the first phase. •During the evaluation phase, we evaluated and implemented the most desirable, feasible, and viable solutions generated in the second phase. Through this process, the first-generation student group at PSU produced new service designs for engaging other first-generation students, while the Native American student group at MSU produced a seven-part poster series and social media campaign designed to welcome Native American students into the library. In addition to co-designing new services, Participatory Design also aims to generate political outcomes that focus on empowering participants. The foundational values of Participatory Design include mutual learning, power sharing, and the equal recognition of expertise among all participants. Within this equity-focused, participatory framework, the students participants became expert library users who expressed readiness to advocate for the library to their peers. More than that, the students—members of underrepresented populations who often feel at the margins—developed a stronger sense of place and confidence on campus that will contribute to their success at our institutions. And for the librarian facilitators, the in-depth co-design process enhanced our ability to understand these student populations. We gained new insights into the experience of our student participants that we can apply to better serve these important populations. Ultimately, the Participatory Design process equipped us with the tools and insights to assess and improve the conditions of their success.In this way, we found Participatory Design to be an empowering, compassionate, and effective approach for designing and assessing library services and experiences. This paper will present the principles of Participatory Design, our step-by-step process, and the challenges and limitations of this approach. The key takeaway of this paper will be practical recommendations for building a sustainable, participatory design and assessment program with underrepresented populations.","PeriodicalId":193553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31229/osf.io/hr8sj","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

How can we ensure that underrepresented populations succeed at our institutions? Participatory Design offers one answer to this question. Participatory Design is a socially-active, values-driven approach to co-creation that seeks to give voice to those who have been traditionally unheard. A team of librarians from Penn State University (PSU) and Montana State University (MSU) followed a parallel design process with two different populations: PSU worked with first-generation students and MSU worked with Native American students. Each project team facilitated a series of 10 workshops with student participants that followed a three-phase process: exploration, generation, and evaluation.•During the exploration phase, we explored topics, concepts, and problems relating to the library experience of participants. •During the generation phase, we generated ideas and potential solutions around key topics explored in the first phase. •During the evaluation phase, we evaluated and implemented the most desirable, feasible, and viable solutions generated in the second phase. Through this process, the first-generation student group at PSU produced new service designs for engaging other first-generation students, while the Native American student group at MSU produced a seven-part poster series and social media campaign designed to welcome Native American students into the library. In addition to co-designing new services, Participatory Design also aims to generate political outcomes that focus on empowering participants. The foundational values of Participatory Design include mutual learning, power sharing, and the equal recognition of expertise among all participants. Within this equity-focused, participatory framework, the students participants became expert library users who expressed readiness to advocate for the library to their peers. More than that, the students—members of underrepresented populations who often feel at the margins—developed a stronger sense of place and confidence on campus that will contribute to their success at our institutions. And for the librarian facilitators, the in-depth co-design process enhanced our ability to understand these student populations. We gained new insights into the experience of our student participants that we can apply to better serve these important populations. Ultimately, the Participatory Design process equipped us with the tools and insights to assess and improve the conditions of their success.In this way, we found Participatory Design to be an empowering, compassionate, and effective approach for designing and assessing library services and experiences. This paper will present the principles of Participatory Design, our step-by-step process, and the challenges and limitations of this approach. The key takeaway of this paper will be practical recommendations for building a sustainable, participatory design and assessment program with underrepresented populations.
评估和改善代表性不足人口的经验:参与式设计方法
我们如何确保代表性不足的群体在我们的机构中取得成功?参与式设计为这个问题提供了一个答案。参与式设计是一种社会活跃的、价值观驱动的共同创造方法,旨在为那些传统上闻所未闻的人发出声音。来自宾夕法尼亚州立大学(PSU)和蒙大拿州立大学(MSU)的图书馆员团队遵循了两个不同人群的并行设计过程:PSU与第一代学生合作,MSU与美洲原住民学生合作。每个项目团队促进了一系列10个研讨会,学生参与者遵循三个阶段的过程:探索、生成和评估。•在探索阶段,我们探索了与参与者的图书馆体验相关的主题、概念和问题。•在生成阶段,我们围绕第一阶段探索的关键主题产生想法和潜在的解决方案。•在评估阶段,我们评估并实施了第二阶段产生的最理想、最可行和最可行的解决方案。通过这个过程,PSU的第一代学生团体为吸引其他第一代学生制作了新的服务设计,而MSU的美洲原住民学生团体制作了一个由七部分组成的系列海报和社交媒体活动,旨在欢迎美洲原住民学生进入图书馆。除了共同设计新服务外,参与式设计还旨在产生侧重于赋予参与者权力的政治成果。参与式设计的基本价值包括所有参与者之间的相互学习、权力分享和对专业知识的平等认可。在这个以公平为中心的参与性框架中,学生参与者成为图书馆的专家用户,他们表示愿意向同龄人倡导图书馆。更重要的是,这些学生——经常处于边缘的弱势群体——在校园里培养了更强的归属感和信心,这将有助于他们在我们的机构取得成功。对于图书馆员来说,深入的共同设计过程增强了我们了解这些学生群体的能力。我们从学生参与者的经历中获得了新的见解,我们可以应用这些见解来更好地为这些重要人群服务。最终,参与式设计过程为我们提供了评估和改善其成功条件的工具和见解。通过这种方式,我们发现参与式设计是一种授权的、富有同情心的、有效的设计和评估图书馆服务和体验的方法。本文将介绍参与式设计的原则,我们的逐步过程,以及这种方法的挑战和局限性。本文的主要收获将是为代表性不足的人口建立可持续的、参与性的设计和评估方案提供实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信