Simulation-Based Valuation of Project Finance - Does Model Complexity Really Matter?

Florian Weber, Thomas Schmid, M. Pietz, C. Kaserer
{"title":"Simulation-Based Valuation of Project Finance - Does Model Complexity Really Matter?","authors":"Florian Weber, Thomas Schmid, M. Pietz, C. Kaserer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1594116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the impact of model complexity on the net present value distribution and the expected default probability of equity investments in project finance. Model complexity is analyzed along two dimensions: simulation complexity and forecast complexity. We aim to identify model elements which are crucial for the valuation of project finance in practice. First, we present a simulation-based project finance valuation model. Second, we vary several model aspects in order to analyze their impact on the valuation result. For forecast complexity, we apply different volatility and correlation forecasting techniques, e.g. correlation forecasts based on historical values and on a dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) model. Regarding simulation complexity, the number of Monte Carlo iterations, the equity valuation method, and the time resolution are varied. We find that the applied volatility forecasting models have a strong influence on the expected net present value distribution and on the probability of default. In contrast, correlation forecasting models play a minor role. Time resolution and equity valuation are both crucial when specifying a valuation model for project finance. For the number of Monte Carlo iterations, we demonstrate that 100,000 iterations are sufficient to obtain reliable results.","PeriodicalId":364869,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Simulation Methods (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Simulation Methods (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1594116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of model complexity on the net present value distribution and the expected default probability of equity investments in project finance. Model complexity is analyzed along two dimensions: simulation complexity and forecast complexity. We aim to identify model elements which are crucial for the valuation of project finance in practice. First, we present a simulation-based project finance valuation model. Second, we vary several model aspects in order to analyze their impact on the valuation result. For forecast complexity, we apply different volatility and correlation forecasting techniques, e.g. correlation forecasts based on historical values and on a dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) model. Regarding simulation complexity, the number of Monte Carlo iterations, the equity valuation method, and the time resolution are varied. We find that the applied volatility forecasting models have a strong influence on the expected net present value distribution and on the probability of default. In contrast, correlation forecasting models play a minor role. Time resolution and equity valuation are both crucial when specifying a valuation model for project finance. For the number of Monte Carlo iterations, we demonstrate that 100,000 iterations are sufficient to obtain reliable results.
基于仿真的项目融资评估——模型复杂性真的重要吗?
本文分析了项目融资中模型复杂性对股权投资净现值分布和预期违约概率的影响。从仿真复杂度和预测复杂度两个维度分析模型复杂度。我们的目标是确定在实践中对项目融资估值至关重要的模型元素。首先,我们提出了一个基于仿真的项目融资估值模型。其次,我们改变了几个模型方面,以分析它们对估值结果的影响。对于预测的复杂性,我们采用了不同的波动性和相关性预测技术,例如基于历史值的相关性预测和基于动态条件相关(DCC)模型的相关性预测。在模拟复杂性方面,蒙特卡罗迭代次数、股权估值方法和时间分辨率各不相同。我们发现所应用的波动率预测模型对预期净现值分布和违约概率有很强的影响。相比之下,相关预测模型的作用较小。在指定项目融资的估值模型时,时间决议和股权估值都是至关重要的。对于蒙特卡罗迭代的次数,我们证明100,000次迭代足以获得可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信