Principles Audi Et Alteram Partem Compatibility in Litigation Process at State and Religious Court: Impact of Pandemic

Sekhar Chandra Pawana, V. Setyawan
{"title":"Principles Audi Et Alteram Partem Compatibility in Litigation Process at State and Religious Court: Impact of Pandemic","authors":"Sekhar Chandra Pawana, V. Setyawan","doi":"10.35724/mularev.v4i2.4108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic that surge around the world, caused adjustments in various ways, including in the law. The existence of regulations regarding e court strongly supports government programs in suppressing the rate of development of the Covid-19 virus, but on the other hand this development raises questions regarding the application of the principle of audi et alteram partem. This paper aims to present how the application of Principles Audi Et Alteram Partem Compatibility in Litigation Process in State and Religious Court in emergency situation. This study uses an normative method approach with descriptive analytical research specifications. This research seeks to illustrate the facts of the Audi et Alteram Partem Principle Compatibility in E-court anda E-Litigation.. Starting from this, there should be synchronization and uniformity of rules for all judicial processes, which should ideally be conducted electronically. From the results of the study, the implementation of the electronic trial shows the application of the principle of audy et alteram partem. All of this is in the interest of the justice-seeking community itself so that the trial process can better guarantee. It is found that even though the court process is conducted online, the principle of audi et alteram partem can be realized.","PeriodicalId":403227,"journal":{"name":"Musamus Law Review","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musamus Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35724/mularev.v4i2.4108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic that surge around the world, caused adjustments in various ways, including in the law. The existence of regulations regarding e court strongly supports government programs in suppressing the rate of development of the Covid-19 virus, but on the other hand this development raises questions regarding the application of the principle of audi et alteram partem. This paper aims to present how the application of Principles Audi Et Alteram Partem Compatibility in Litigation Process in State and Religious Court in emergency situation. This study uses an normative method approach with descriptive analytical research specifications. This research seeks to illustrate the facts of the Audi et Alteram Partem Principle Compatibility in E-court anda E-Litigation.. Starting from this, there should be synchronization and uniformity of rules for all judicial processes, which should ideally be conducted electronically. From the results of the study, the implementation of the electronic trial shows the application of the principle of audy et alteram partem. All of this is in the interest of the justice-seeking community itself so that the trial process can better guarantee. It is found that even though the court process is conducted online, the principle of audi et alteram partem can be realized.
国家法院和宗教法院诉讼过程中的原则与替代性原则:流行病的影响
Covid-19大流行在全球范围内激增,导致了包括法律在内的各种调整。法院相关规定的存在有力地支持了政府遏制新冠病毒发展速度的计划,但另一方面,这也引发了对“先有后有”原则适用的质疑。本文旨在探讨紧急情况下,国家法院和宗教法院在诉讼过程中如何运用替代性原则。本研究采用规范性方法,并辅以描述性分析研究规范。本研究旨在说明奥迪和奥迪伙伴原则兼容的事实在电子法院和电子诉讼。从这一点出发,所有司法程序的规则应该是同步和统一的,最好是通过电子方式进行。从研究的结果来看,电子试验的实施体现了互动式原理的应用。这一切都是为了追求正义的社会本身的利益,使审判过程得到更好的保障。研究发现,即使法院诉讼程序在网上进行,也可以实现“先审后议”的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信