Invited Paper: Specificity and Practicability of Sports Coaching Articles Published in Sports Coaching Science

J. Chiang
{"title":"Invited Paper: Specificity and Practicability of Sports Coaching Articles Published in Sports Coaching Science","authors":"J. Chiang","doi":"10.5297/ser.1701.editorial","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sports coaching science has the character of multidisciplinary and with a true value of practicability. This article aimed to review and analyze the specificity and practicability for articles being published in Sports Coaching Science by Sports & Exercise Research 2006-2014. The results indicated that a total of 449 articles were published and there appeared lack of proportion and imbalance among ten academic fields. 38 out of 449 articles were adopted and published in Sports Coaching Science and were distributed in 9 categories, the number and percentage in each category were as follows: 9 (23.68%) in analysis of competition skill performance; 9 (23.68%) in effect of training methods; 4 (10.53%) in competition strategy; 4 (10.53%) in technology innovation; 3 (7.89%) in sport/event specific characteristics; 3 (7.89%) in other topics; 2 (5.26%) in elite athletes case study; 2 (5.26%) in training monitoring and, 2 (5.26%) in comparative analysis on competitions, respectively. When further exam the specificity and practicability of the articles revealed that there is a need to be improved including: subjects used in the studies were mostly collegiate students and the result can hardly being applied to the top athletes; the experimental period of the studies ranged from 6-8 weeks which were relatively short to be considered as a sound scientific research; the literature reviewed need to include the most recent studies and the topics need to be up to date with international trends; most studies were conducted in a single rather than multidisciplinary approaches; the research topics need to match up with national sports policies; studies on training methods and techniques need to be more innovative and focus on key methods and/or techniques to win. It was concluded that the quality and quantity of the articles that may be improved by increasing the number in each issue and thus ensured a balanced proportion among academic fields.","PeriodicalId":338279,"journal":{"name":"Sports & Exercise Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports & Exercise Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1701.editorial","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sports coaching science has the character of multidisciplinary and with a true value of practicability. This article aimed to review and analyze the specificity and practicability for articles being published in Sports Coaching Science by Sports & Exercise Research 2006-2014. The results indicated that a total of 449 articles were published and there appeared lack of proportion and imbalance among ten academic fields. 38 out of 449 articles were adopted and published in Sports Coaching Science and were distributed in 9 categories, the number and percentage in each category were as follows: 9 (23.68%) in analysis of competition skill performance; 9 (23.68%) in effect of training methods; 4 (10.53%) in competition strategy; 4 (10.53%) in technology innovation; 3 (7.89%) in sport/event specific characteristics; 3 (7.89%) in other topics; 2 (5.26%) in elite athletes case study; 2 (5.26%) in training monitoring and, 2 (5.26%) in comparative analysis on competitions, respectively. When further exam the specificity and practicability of the articles revealed that there is a need to be improved including: subjects used in the studies were mostly collegiate students and the result can hardly being applied to the top athletes; the experimental period of the studies ranged from 6-8 weeks which were relatively short to be considered as a sound scientific research; the literature reviewed need to include the most recent studies and the topics need to be up to date with international trends; most studies were conducted in a single rather than multidisciplinary approaches; the research topics need to match up with national sports policies; studies on training methods and techniques need to be more innovative and focus on key methods and/or techniques to win. It was concluded that the quality and quantity of the articles that may be improved by increasing the number in each issue and thus ensured a balanced proportion among academic fields.
特邀论文:《运动教练的特殊性与实用性》,发表于《运动教练科学》
体育教练学具有多学科的特点,具有真正的实用价值。本文旨在对2006-2014年《体育与运动研究》在《体育教练科学》上发表的文章的专用性和实用性进行综述和分析。结果表明,共发表论文449篇,10个学术领域之间存在比例不足和不平衡现象。在《体育教练科学》杂志上发表的449篇文章中,有38篇被采用,分布在9个类别中,每类文章的数量和百分比如下:竞赛技术表现分析9篇(23.68%);9(23.68%)培训方法有效;竞争战略4 (10.53%);4位(10.53%);3(7.89%)在运动/项目特定特征方面;3(7.89%)在其他主题;优秀运动员2例(5.26%);训练监测2名(5.26%),比赛比较分析2名(5.26%)。进一步考察文章的专用性和实用性,发现研究的对象以大学生为主,研究结果难以适用于优秀运动员;研究的实验周期为6-8周,相对较短,可以认为是一项可靠的科学研究;审查的文献需要包括最新的研究,主题需要跟上国际趋势;大多数研究采用单一而非多学科方法进行;研究课题需要与国家体育政策相匹配;对训练方法和技术的研究需要更多的创新,关注关键的方法和/或技术来赢得比赛。结论是,可以通过增加每期的数量来提高文章的质量和数量,从而确保各学术领域之间的比例平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信