A Quantitative Analysis of Offensive Cyber Operation (OCO) Automation Tools

Samuel Zurowski, George Lord, I. Baggili
{"title":"A Quantitative Analysis of Offensive Cyber Operation (OCO) Automation Tools","authors":"Samuel Zurowski, George Lord, I. Baggili","doi":"10.1145/3538969.3544414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ecosystem for automated offensive security tools has grown in recent years. As more tools automate offensive security techniques via Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), it may result in vulnerabilities due to adversarial attacks. Therefore, it is imperative that research is conducted to help understand the techniques used by these security tools. Our work explores the current state of the art in offensive security tools. First, we employ an abstract model that can be used to understand what phases of an Offensive Cyber Operation (OCO) can be automated. We then adopt a generalizable taxonomy, and apply it to automation tools (such as normal automation and the use of artificial intelligence in automation). We then curated a dataset of tools and research papers and quantitatively analyzed it. Our work resulted in a public dataset that includes analysis of (n=57) papers and OCO tools that are mapped to the the MITRE ATT&CK Framework enterprise techniques, applicable phases of our OCO model, and the details of the automation technique. The results show a need for a granular expansion on the ATT&CK Exploit Public-Facing application technique. A critical finding is that most OCO tools employed Simple Rule Based automation, hinting at a lucrative research opportunity for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in future OCO tooling.","PeriodicalId":306813,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3538969.3544414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The ecosystem for automated offensive security tools has grown in recent years. As more tools automate offensive security techniques via Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), it may result in vulnerabilities due to adversarial attacks. Therefore, it is imperative that research is conducted to help understand the techniques used by these security tools. Our work explores the current state of the art in offensive security tools. First, we employ an abstract model that can be used to understand what phases of an Offensive Cyber Operation (OCO) can be automated. We then adopt a generalizable taxonomy, and apply it to automation tools (such as normal automation and the use of artificial intelligence in automation). We then curated a dataset of tools and research papers and quantitatively analyzed it. Our work resulted in a public dataset that includes analysis of (n=57) papers and OCO tools that are mapped to the the MITRE ATT&CK Framework enterprise techniques, applicable phases of our OCO model, and the details of the automation technique. The results show a need for a granular expansion on the ATT&CK Exploit Public-Facing application technique. A critical finding is that most OCO tools employed Simple Rule Based automation, hinting at a lucrative research opportunity for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in future OCO tooling.
进攻性网络作战(OCO)自动化工具的定量分析
近年来,自动化攻击性安全工具的生态系统不断发展。随着越来越多的工具通过人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)自动化攻击性安全技术,它可能会因对抗性攻击而导致漏洞。因此,必须进行研究,以帮助理解这些安全工具使用的技术。我们的工作探索了攻击性安全工具的当前状态。首先,我们采用了一个抽象模型,可以用来理解进攻性网络行动(OCO)的哪些阶段可以自动化。然后我们采用一种一般化的分类法,并将其应用于自动化工具(例如普通自动化和在自动化中使用人工智能)。然后,我们整理了一个工具和研究论文的数据集,并对其进行了定量分析。我们的工作产生了一个公共数据集,其中包括对(n=57)篇论文和OCO工具的分析,这些工具被映射到MITRE ATT&CK框架企业技术,我们的OCO模型的适用阶段以及自动化技术的细节。结果表明,需要对ATT&CK开发面向公众的应用技术进行粒度扩展。一个关键的发现是,大多数OCO工具都采用了基于简单规则的自动化,这暗示着在未来的OCO工具中使用人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)是一个有利可图的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信